Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. v. Or-Cal, Inc

Filing 14

ORDER re 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 275, receipt number 54611010500.) MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 275, receipt number 54611010500.) filed by Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 9/30/2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)

Download PDF
s?3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - - -- ---------------R-ichar ---W----'Nl_.of.dng_ Clerk lj. 1, Di~;.ttld r~;;.r..;.l,.-lrt Northern 1b trict O'f CallfornH~ ~n Jose FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 TESSENDERLO KERLEY, INC., a Delaware corporation, 8 9 - 10 II .... :::1 0 - u .... .... . OJ .... "' ~ 0: 12 <E ~ u ~ ~ ·c 14 E 15 ~ Jl v. OR-CAL, Inc., an Oregon corporation, (Proposed) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE Defendant. _________________________,/ 13 0 . .... "' • § Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV 11-04100 PSG ~ Seth A. Watkins , whose business address and telephone number is STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036; Telephone No. 202-429-3000 0 <J:J z = 16 17 " "0 .;; :; ;;;. "" 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of District of Columbia having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing. 25 26 27 28 Dated: 9/30/2011 The Honorable Paul Singh Grewal United States Ma~~:istrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?