Injazat Technology Fund B.S.C. v. Najafi et al

Filing 25

ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY ON BEHALF OF INZAJAT TECHNOLOGY FUND B.S.C. 21 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/23/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2012)

Download PDF
** E-filed January 23, 2012 ** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DEAN HANSELL, SBN 93731 dhansell@dl.com MAYA C. DHARWARKAR, SBN 249702 mdharwarkar@dl.com DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Suite 2600 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1530 Telephone: (213) 621-6000 Facsimile: (213) 621-6100 Attorneys for Petitioner INJAZAT TECHNOLOGY FUND B.S.C. 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 INJAZAT TECHNOLOGY FUND B.S.C., 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. DR. HAMID NAJAFI AND MICHAEL CUMMISKEY, Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV11-04133 HRL [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY ON BEHALF OF INJAZAT TECHNOLOGY FUND B.S.C. Hearing: Date: N/A Time: N/A Courtroom: N/A 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY PETITION FOR ORDER TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD CV11-04133 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Petitioner Injazat Technology Fund B.S.C. (“Injazat”) hereby withdraws its current attorney of record: Maya C. Dharwarkar Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP 333 S. Grand Ave. #2600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: 213-621-6000 Fax: 213-621-611 e-mail: mdharwarkar@dl.com and substitutes the following attorney as the attorney of record: Dean Hansell Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP 333 S. Grand Ave. #2600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: 213-621-6000 Fax: 213-621-611 e-mail: dhansell@dl.com 12 13 14 15 16 January 23, 2012 Dated: __________________ ___________________________ Hon. Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge Northern District of California 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY CV11-04133

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?