Solis v. United Buffet, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER cancelling show cause hearing.(rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JANET M. HEROLD Regional Solicitor ANDREW J. SCHULTZ, Trial Attorney California State Bar Number 237231 United States Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor 90 Seventh Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, California 94103 Telephone: (415) 625-7745 Facsimile: (415) 625-7772 email: schultz.andrew@dol.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff, Thomas E. Perez,1 Secretary United States Department of Labor 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 15 THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, 16 Petitioner, 17 v. 18 19 21 UNITED BUFFET, INC. dba CRAZY BUFFET, a corporation; ZHOU NI, an individual, 22 Respondents. 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Case No.: 11-cv-4194-RMW ORDER CANCELLING AUGUST 30, 2013, SHOW CAUSE HEARING Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 23 24 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Secretary having withdrawn his May 15, 25 26 2013, Petition for Civil Contempt, the court will not hold a hearing on August 30, 2013, 27 28 1 Thomas E. Perez was sworn in as the Secretary of Labor on July 23, 2013. Pursuant to FRCP Order Approving Withdrawal of Petition for Civil Contempt Case No. 11-cv-4194 RMW 1 1 2 on why Zhou Ni and United Buffet, Inc., doing business as Crazy Buffet, should not be held in civil contempt for failure to comply with the judgment entered by this Court in 3 4 this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: ________________ 8/19/2013 ________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25(d) the caption has been changed to reflect his appointment. Order Approving Withdrawal of Petition for Civil Contempt Case No. 11-cv-4194 RMW 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?