Tessera, Inc. v. Sony Corporation
Filing
47
ORDER ON 43 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME. The motion for a protective order is deemed suitable for determination without oral argument. Accordingly, the July 31, 2012 heaing is VACATED. Defendant's request for hearing on July 3 is D ENIED. The following briefing schedule shall apply: Plaintiff shall file its opposition no later than July 3, 2012. Defendant shall file any reply no later than July 5, 2012. Any and all future discovery disputes must be resolved by complying with the undersigned's Standing Order re: Civil Discovery Disputes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/28/2012. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2012)
1
** E-filed June 28, 2012 **
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
8
United States District Court
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
TESSERA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
SONY, CORP.,
No. C11-04399 EJD (HRL)
ORDER ON DEFENDANT SONY’S
MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME ON
ITS MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE
ORDER
14
15
16
Defendant.
____________________________________/
[Re: Docket No. 43]
On June 26, 2012, Sony Corp. (“Sony”) filed a Motion for a Protective Order to limit
17
depositions scheduled to take place beginning July 9, 2012 in Osaka, Japan. Dkt. Nos. 44, 45. The
18
motion is currently set for hearing on July 31, 2012. Dkt. No. 45. Sony simultaneously filed a
19
Motion to shorten time on the motion for a protective order, requesting an extremely accelerated
20
briefing schedule and a hearing on July 3, 2012. Dkt. No. 43. As a preliminary matter, the court
21
notes that Sony has failed to comply with the undersigned’s Standing Order re: Civil Discovery
22
Disputes. The Standing Order requires parties to resolve all discovery disputes by first having lead
23
counsel for the parties meet and confer in person, and, if such conference fails to resolve the issue,
24
filing a Joint Discovery Dispute Joint Report in which each party proposes its resolution and the
25
legal authority supporting its proposal. Normally, this court will not hear any noticed discovery
26
motion, and will instead order the parties to comply with the undersigned’s Standing Order.
27
However, in light of the pressing nature of this dispute, and the fact that Sony has left extremely
28
1
little time for its resolution, it appears that the court must hear the motion in as expeditious a fashion
2
as possible. Accordingly, the court ORDERS the following:
3
All parties shall comply with the undersigned’s Standing Order re: Civil Discovery Disputes
4
for any and all future discovery disputes. It is the responsibility of the parties not to let disputes go
5
unresolved until the last possible moment.
6
The motion for a protective order is deemed suitable for determination without oral
7
argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the July 31, 2012 hearing is VACATED. In addition,
8
Sony’s request for a hearing to take place on July 3, 2012 is DENIED.
For the Northern District of California
The following expedited briefing schedule shall apply: Tessera shall file its opposition brief
10
United States District Court
9
no later than July 3, 2012. Sony shall file any reply no later than July 5, 2012. The court will issue a
11
written order.
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 28, 2012
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
C11-04399 EJD (HRL) Notice will be electronically mailed to:
2
Melissa McCormick
Benjamin Hattenbach
Brian Ledahl
Morgan Chu
Nathan Lowenstein
Richard Krebs
Eileen Ridley
Aaron Moore
Matthew Lowrie
Ruben Rodrigues
3
4
5
6
mmccormick@irell.com
bhattenbach@irell.com
bledahl@irell.com
mchu@irell.com
nlowenstein@irell.com
rkrebs@irell.com
eridley@foley.com
amoore@foley.com
mlowrie@foley.com
rrodrigues@foley.com
7
8
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?