Basich v. Patenaude and Felix, APC et al

Filing 86

INTERIM ORDER re 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff's papers (no more than 2 pages) re DDJR #3 due by 5:00 PM on 6/11/2012. Defendants' response (no more than 7 pages) due by noon, 6/13/2012. Unless otherwise ordered, matter will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/8/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED: June 8, 2012* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 15 No. C11-04406 EJD (HRL) MARY BASICH, INTERIM ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiff, v. PATENAUDE & FELIX, APC. and CAPITAL ONE BANK, (USA), N.A.; DOES 1-10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. / 17 18 This court has received plaintiff’s “Request to Reconsider Order on Discovery Dispute 19 Joint Report #1.” (Dkt. No. 66). The request was not brought as a motion for leave to file a 20 motion for reconsideration, see Civ. L.R. 7-9(a); and, the court finds that arguments now being 21 asserted by plaintiff should have been made in connection with the underlying DDJR. 22 Nevertheless, and notwithstanding these deficiencies, plaintiff’s request will be deemed its 23 motion for reconsideration as to DDJR #1; and, this court is seriously considering plaintiff’s 24 request. 25 As for DDJR #3, plaintiff’s request makes only passing reference to it. In any event, 26 this court sees no basis for “reconsidering” the ruling on that DDJR. But, plaintiff will be given 27 an opportunity to tell the court why reconsideration is warranted. See CIV. L.R. 7-9(b). 28 Plaintiff’s papers shall be limited to 2 pages and shall be filed by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, June 1 2 11, 2012. Defendants may respond to plaintiff’s papers re DDJR #1 and DDJR #3. Any such 3 response shall be limited to 7 pages and shall be filed no later than noon on Wednesday, June 4 13, 2012. 5 6 7 8 Unless otherwise ordered, the matter will then be deemed submitted on the papers without oral argument. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 8, 2012 9 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 5:11-cv-04406-EJD Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Balam Osberto Letona 3 Candice Lynn Fields cfields@kmtg.com, lchenknapp@kmtg.com, mmcguire@kmtg.com, SRamirez@kmtg.com letonalaw@gmail.com 4 Danielle Renee Teeters dteeters@kmtg.com, sramirez@kmtg.com 5 June D. Coleman jcoleman@kmtg.com, krockenstein@kmtg.com, lchenknapp@kmtg.com 6 Lucius Wallace luke@hwh-law.com, tammy@hwh-law.com 7 Robert David Humphreys david@hwh-law.com, tammy@hwh-law.com 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?