LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al
Filing
91
ORDER RE: LETTERS FROM COUNSEL. Counsel is referred to Section VI of this courts Scheduling Notes. The court will take no action and will not consider the letters and other documents which appear as Docket Item Nos. 87 through 90. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/10/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2012)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD.,
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-04494 EJD
ORDER RE: LETTERS FROM COUNSEL
7
Plaintiff(s),
8
9
v.
SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et. al.,
[Docket Item No(s). 87-90]
10
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Defendant(s).
/
11
12
Counsel for both Plaintiff and Defendant have recently filed a letters requesting the court
13
consider additional evidence and argument in support of and opposing certain pending motions. See
14
Docket Item Nos. 87-90. Counsel is referred to Section VI of this court’s Scheduling Notes,
15
publicly available on the website for the Northern District of California, which states:
16
17
18
19
The Court does not respond to letters or letter briefs seeking legal
relief from the Court, unless leave to make such a request has been
specifically granted. All requests requiring the Court to take action
shall be made by either a Stipulation and Proposed Order or by
appropriate motion made pursuant to the Local Rules.
Counsel are therefore ordered to present any further requests for the consideration of
20
additional information accordingly. The court will take no action and will not consider the letters
21
and other documents which appear as Docket Item Nos. 87 through 90.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: April 10, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-04494 EJD
ORDER RE: LETTERS FROM COUNSEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?