Nukala v. Santa Clara County Offie of Education

Filing 10

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 2/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Pretrial Conference set for 2/19/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/6/12. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Limited Scope Representation)(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 ** E-filed January 6, 2012 ** 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California NOT FOR CITATION 8 United States District Court 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 PADMAVATHI NUKALA, Plaintiff, 12 v. No. C11-04521 HRL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 13 14 SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, 15 Defendant. ____________________________________/ 16 The order that follows is based on the discussion at the January 3, 2012 Case Management 17 Conference and the previously filed Joint Case Management Statement. 18 The court adopts the parties’ statement of disputed factual and legal issues as set forth in the 19 Joint Case Management Statement. The presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal 20 21 Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply. Parties shall exchange their initial disclosures no later than January 23, 2012. 22 Upon further reflection, the court has decided not to refer this case to court-sponsored 23 24 mediation. Instead, the parties shall participate in a Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge Grewal. The parties are directed to contact his chambers forthwith to schedule a Settlement 25 Conference to take place within 120 days from the date of this order. If the plaintiff would welcome 26 27 the assistance of a volunteer attorney for limited scope representation for the Settlement Conference, she should sign and return to the court in the envelope provided the enclosed Declaration. 28 The following schedule shall also apply to this case: 1 Fact Discovery Cutoff August 27, 2012 2 Designation of Experts with Reports September 17, 2012 3 Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports October 9, 2012 4 Expert Discovery Cutoff October 29, 2012 5 Last Day for Hearings on Dispositive Motions December 18, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. 6 Final Pretrial Conference February 19, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. 7 Jury Trial February 25, 2013 8 In the event discovery disputes arise, the parties shall comply with this court’s “Standing 9 Order re: Civil Discovery Disputes,” which sets forth the applicable requirements and procedures For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 for filing Discovery Dispute Joint Reports rather than noticed discovery motions. 1 Parties seeking to 11 compel fact discovery must file a Joint Report no later than seven days after the Fact Discovery 12 Cutoff, and parties seeking to compel expert discovery must file a Joint Report no later than seven 13 days after the Expert Discovery Cutoff. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 37-3. Furthermore, the parties shall comply with the court’s “Standing Order re: Pretrial 14 15 Preparation” with respect to the timing and content of the Joint Pretrial Statement and other pretrial 16 submissions. IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: January 6, 2012 19 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Parties may obtain copies of all of Judge Lloyd’s standing orders from the clerk of the court, or from Judge Lloyd’s page on the court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov). 2 1 C 11-04521 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 Mark E. Davis 3 Notice will be sent by mail to: 4 Padmavathi Nukala 417 Anza Street Fremont, CA 94539 5 6 7 mdavis@davisyounglaw.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?