Nukala v. Santa Clara County Offie of Education
Filing
10
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 2/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Pretrial Conference set for 2/19/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/6/12. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Limited Scope Representation)(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)
1
** E-filed January 6, 2012 **
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
8
United States District Court
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
PADMAVATHI NUKALA,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
No. C11-04521 HRL
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING
ORDER
13
14
SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF
EDUCATION,
15
Defendant.
____________________________________/
16
The order that follows is based on the discussion at the January 3, 2012 Case Management
17
Conference and the previously filed Joint Case Management Statement.
18
The court adopts the parties’ statement of disputed factual and legal issues as set forth in the
19
Joint Case Management Statement. The presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal
20
21
Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply. Parties shall exchange their initial disclosures no later than
January 23, 2012.
22
Upon further reflection, the court has decided not to refer this case to court-sponsored
23
24
mediation. Instead, the parties shall participate in a Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge
Grewal. The parties are directed to contact his chambers forthwith to schedule a Settlement
25
Conference to take place within 120 days from the date of this order. If the plaintiff would welcome
26
27
the assistance of a volunteer attorney for limited scope representation for the Settlement Conference,
she should sign and return to the court in the envelope provided the enclosed Declaration.
28
The following schedule shall also apply to this case:
1
Fact Discovery Cutoff
August 27, 2012
2
Designation of Experts with Reports
September 17, 2012
3
Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports
October 9, 2012
4
Expert Discovery Cutoff
October 29, 2012
5
Last Day for Hearings on Dispositive Motions
December 18, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.
6
Final Pretrial Conference
February 19, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.
7
Jury Trial
February 25, 2013
8
In the event discovery disputes arise, the parties shall comply with this court’s “Standing
9
Order re: Civil Discovery Disputes,” which sets forth the applicable requirements and procedures
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
for filing Discovery Dispute Joint Reports rather than noticed discovery motions. 1 Parties seeking to
11
compel fact discovery must file a Joint Report no later than seven days after the Fact Discovery
12
Cutoff, and parties seeking to compel expert discovery must file a Joint Report no later than seven
13
days after the Expert Discovery Cutoff. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 37-3.
Furthermore, the parties shall comply with the court’s “Standing Order re: Pretrial
14
15
Preparation” with respect to the timing and content of the Joint Pretrial Statement and other pretrial
16
submissions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated: January 6, 2012
19
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Parties may obtain copies of all of Judge Lloyd’s standing orders from the clerk of the court, or
from Judge Lloyd’s page on the court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov).
2
1
C 11-04521 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to:
2
Mark E. Davis
3
Notice will be sent by mail to:
4
Padmavathi Nukala
417 Anza Street
Fremont, CA 94539
5
6
7
mdavis@davisyounglaw.com
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?