Equal Employment Opportunity Commision v. BRT Management Company, Inc et al

Filing 6

ORDER (1) Continuing Initial Case Management Conference; and (2) Re-Setting Deadline for Plaintiff's Consent or Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. Initial case management conference continued to 1/10/2012, 1:30 PM. Plaintiff's consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge due by 11/21/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/14/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)

1
2

*E-FILED 11-14-2011*

3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

7

No. C11-04536 HRL

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION,

12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
17

BRT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. d/b/a/
BUY-RITE THRIFT STORE, and W. & J.
MGT. CO., INC. d/b/a BUY-RITE THRIFT
STORE,

ORDER (1) CONTINUING INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
AND (2) RE-SETTING DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFF’S CONSENT OR
DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE
A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

Defendants.
/

18
19

There being no appearance by defendants, the initial case management conference set

20

for November 15, 2011 is continued to January 10, 2012, 1:30 p.m. No later than November

21

21, 2011, plaintiff shall file either (1) a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate

22

Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment

23

to a United States District Judge. Civ. L.R. 73-1. The forms are available from the Clerk of the

24

Court and on the court’s website at http://cand.uscourts.gov. Each party is free to decline to

25

proceed before a magistrate judge and to request reassignment to a district judge without

26

adverse substantive consequences. FED. R. CIV. P. 73(b)(2).

27
28

SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 14, 2011
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

5:11-cv-04536-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

2

Debra A. Smith [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]

3
Jonathan T. Peck

[e-mail]

4
5

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2