Maersk Line v. Lee

Filing 10

ORDER RE DISMISSAL re 9 Stipulation filed by Maersk Line. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on December 30, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Stephen M. Uthoff, State Bar No. 145206 E-mail: suthoff@uthofflaw.com The Uthoff Law Corporation 401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 710 Long Beach, California 90802 Tele: 562-437-4301 Fax: 562-437-4341 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff MAERSK LINE 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) STEVEN LEE individually and dba LOTUS INTERNATIONAL TRADING ) ) ) Defendant. __________________________________ ) MAERSK LINE, Case No. CV 11-04552 PSG IN ADMIRALTY [PROPOSED] INTERLOCUTORY DISMISSAL 20 21 22 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, the complaint herein is dismissed 23 without prejudice, as to all parties and all causes of action subject to the terms of this Order. 24 Plaintiff may have up to and including October 30, 2012 to reopen this case only if the 25 settlement is not consummated for any reason and a written request to reopen this case is 26 filed with this Court on or before October 30, 2012. Said reopener shall be for the purposes 27 of having judgment entered pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. 28 1 1 If Plaintiff has not requested this Court to reopen the case on or before October 30, 2 2012 the complaint will therefore be deemed dismissed with prejudice as to all parties and 3 all causes of action with each party to bear its own costs and fees. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 30 Dated: December__, 2011 ____________________________ Honorable Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 710, Long Beach, California 90802. On December 19, 2011, I served the foregoing document described as [PROPOSED] INTERLOCUTORY DISMISSAL on the interested parties by placing a copy in an envelope addressed as follows: Mark Russakow Russakow Greene & Tan 800 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 210 Pasadena, CA 91101 [x ] BY MAIL: I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Long Beach, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on the same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Long Beach, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 18 19 [] VIA CM/ECF: Pursuant to General Order 10-7 the forgoing document was served on counsel via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 20 [X] Federal: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. 21 22 Executed on December 19 , 2011 at Long Beach, California. 23 _s/Stephen M. Uthoff_______ Stephen M. Uthoff 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?