Burrell et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
Filing
99
ORDER Re: Witness and Exhibit Lists and Plaintiffs' Deposition Designation. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on April 30, 2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
ALMA BURRELL, VICKYE HAYTER,
MARGARET HEADD,
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
17
18
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, DAN
PEDDYCORD, RAE WEDEL, MARTY
FENSTERSHEIB AND DOES 1 THROUGH
50, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-4569-LHK
ORDER RE: WITNESS AND EXHIBIT
LISTS AND PLAINTIFFS’
DEPOSITION DESIGNATION
19
20
The Court orders the parties to file by noon on Thursday, May 2, 2013, revised witness and
21
exhibit lists in light of the Court’s intended rulings on Defendants’ pending motions as set forth in
22
ECF No. 98. The parties’ revised witness lists shall identify which witnesses will be called and
23
which witnesses may be called. The parties’ revised witness lists also shall identify whether each
24
witness will testify live or by deposition.
25
Plaintiffs’ Designation of Deposition Testimony in Lieu of Live Testimony, ECF No. 82,
26
designates the entire deposition of Belita Proctor, LCPC. Such designation of the entire transcript
27
is overly broad. Plaintiffs must file a designation of specific page and line numbers of Belita
28
Proctor’s deposition by 10 a.m. on Wednesday, May 1, 2013.
1
Case No.: 11-CV-04569-LHK
ORDER RE: WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS AND PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATION
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: April 30, 2013
3
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-04569-LHK
ORDER RE: WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS AND PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?