Noll v. eBay, Inc et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for eBay Europe S.A.R.L. and eBay International AG to Respond to Complaint and Scheduling Motion to Dismiss Hearing for March 2, 2012 re 34 Stipulation. Response due 12/16/2011 Motion due by 1/27/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/2/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 COOLEY LLP JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com) JAMES M. PENNING (229727) (jpenning@cooley.com) KARA C. WILSON (268535) (kwilson@cooley.com) Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 COOLEY LLP WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) (wsomvichian@cooley.com) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 Attorneys for Defendants eBay Inc., eBay Europe S.A.R.L and eBay International AG 15 FIGARI & DAVENPORT, LLP KEITH R. VERGES (kverges@figdav.com)* PARKER D. YOUNG (parker.young@figdav.com)* RAYMOND E. WALKER (ray.walker@figdav.com* 901 Main Street, Suite 3400 Dallas, TX 75202 Telephone: (214) 939-2000 Facsimile: (214) 939-2090 *Admitted Pro Hac Vice 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL 17 Additional attorneys listed on signature page 12 13 14 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN JOSE DIVISION 21 22 23 24 25 26 RICHARD NOLL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No. CV 11-04585 EJD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR EBAY EUROPE S.A.R.L. AND EBAY INTERNATIONAL AG TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SCHEDULING MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING FOR MARCH 2, 2012 Plaintiffs, v. EBAY INC., EBAY EUROPE S.A.R.L., and EBAY INTERNATIONAL AG, Courtroom: Judge: Trial Date: Defendants. 27 1, 5th Floor Hon. Edward J. Davila None Set 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 1. STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESP. TO COMP. & SCHED. MTD HRG CV 11-04585 1 This Stipulation is entered into pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, by and between plaintiff 2 Richard Noll (“Plaintiff”) and defendants eBay Europe S.A.R.L. (“eBay Europe”) and eBay 3 International AG (“eBay International”), by and through their respective counsel. 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the above-entitled action in United States District Court for the Northern District of California on September 15, 2011; WHEREAS, on October 31, 2011, eBay Inc. filed its motion to dismiss the Complaint which is set for hearing on March 2, 2012; 8 WHEREAS, eBay Europe and eBay International are both international entities that must 9 be served using the applicable service procedures set forth in the Hague Convention on the 10 11 12 13 14 Service Abroad of Judicial and Extra-Judicial documents in Civil and Commercial Matters; WHEREAS, Noll has undertaken efforts to serve both entities and believes eBay Europe was served on November 4, 2011, and eBay International on November 9, 2011; WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), parties may stipulate in writing, without a court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to a complaint; 15 WHEREAS, extending the date for eBay Europe and eBay International to respond to the 16 Complaint as set forth below will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by 17 Court order; 18 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the hearing on eBay Europe’s and eBay International’s 19 anticipated motion to dismiss should be scheduled for the same date and time – March 2, 2012 at 20 9:00 a.m. – as the hearing on eBay Inc’s pending motion; 21 WHEREAS, under Local Rule 7-2, motions may be filed thirty-five (35) days in advance 22 of a hearing, which in this case would be on or before January 27, 2012; 23 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that: 24 25 1. The deadline for eBay Europe and eBay International to respond to the Complaint (answer, move, or otherwise respond) is extended to and including December 16, 2011; and 26 2. The hearing on eBay Europe’s and eBay International’s anticipated motion to dismiss the 27 Complaint be scheduled for March 2, 2012, the same date as the hearing on eBay Inc’s pending 28 motion to dismiss. COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 2. STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESP. TO COMP. & SCHED. MTD HRG CV 11-04585 1 2 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 30, 2011 COOLEY LLP 4 /s/ JAMES M. PENNING (229727) 5 6 7 8 Attorneys For Defendants EBAY INC., EBAY EUROPE S.A.R.L AND EBAY INTERNATIONAL AG Dated: November 30, 2011 FIGARI & DAVENPORT, LLP 9 /s/ KEITH R. VERGES 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL 12 13 14 15 16 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: December 2, 2011 17 Honorable Edward J. Davila United States District Judge 18 Additional attorneys: 19 LAW OFFICE OF SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD (leuthold@aol.com) 1671 The Alameda, Suite 303 San Jose, CA 95126 Telephone: (408) 924-0132 Facsimile: (408) 924-0134 20 21 22 23 26 THOMPSON & BROOKS VERA BROOKS (vbrooks@thompsonbrooks.com)* 412 E. Madison Street, Suite 900 Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 387-1822 Facsimile: (813) 387-1825 *Admitted Pro Hac Vice 27 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL 24 25 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 3. STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESP. TO COMP. & SCHED. MTD HRG CV 11-04585 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 2 I, James M. Penning, attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation and 3 [Proposed] Order Extending Time For eBay Europe S.A.R.L. and eBay International AG to 4 Respond to Complaint and Scheduling Motion to Dismiss Hearing for March 2, 2012 has been 5 obtained from each of the other signatories. 6 /s/ James M. Penning 7 8 9 10 11 12 990079 v1/HN 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 4. STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESP. TO COMP. & SCHED. MTD HRG CV 11-04585

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?