Noll v. eBay, Inc et al
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Enlarge Page Limits for Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/9/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2011)
7
8
9
10
SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD
(leuthold@aol.com)
LAW OFFICE OF SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD
1671 The Alameda #303
San Jose, California 95126
Tel: (408) 924-0132
Fax:: (408) 924-0134
R NIA
. Davila
LI
A
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
VERA BROOKS
(vbrooks@thompsonbrookslaw.com)
THOMPSON & BROOKS
412 E. Madison Street, Suite 900
Tampa, Florida 33602
Tel: (813) 387-1822
Fax: (813) 387-1824
(Pro Hac Vice Application Planned)
11
12
ER
d w a rd J
FO
S
6
J u d ge E
H
5
RT
4
TED
GRAN
NO
3
UNIT
ED
2
KEITH R. VERGES (kverges@figdav.com)
PARKER D. YOUNG (parker.young@figdav.com)
RAYMOND E. WALKER (ray.walker@figdav.com
FIGARI & DAVENPORT, L.L.P.
901 Main Street, Suite 3400
Dallas, Texas 75202
Tel: (214) 939-2000
Fax: (214) 939-2090
(Pro Hac Vice Application Pending)
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
RICHARD NOLL
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
SAN JOSE DIVISION
RICHARD NOLL, Individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
18
19
v.
20
EBAY, INC., EBAY EUROPE S.A.R.L.,
and EBAY INTERNATIONAL AG
21
22
23
24
25
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-04585-EJD
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE
PAGE LIMITS FOR PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Pursuant to L. R. 7.12 and 7.4(b), Plaintiff and Defendant eBay, Inc. (“eBay”) file this
stipulation regarding the modification of page limits allowed for Plaintiff’s opposition to eBay’s
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS FOR PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
PAGE 1
1
pending motion to dismiss [Docket no. 24]. In that regard, Plaintiff requests an enlargement of
2
the page limits for his opposition and brief in support up to 30 pages, and states:
3
I.
4
5
Pursuant to the parties’ prior stipulation, Plaintiff’s response to eBay’s motion to dismiss
6
is due by December 9, 2011. [Docket no. 33.] This request is made before the due date for
7
Plaintiff’s opposition pursuant to Local Rule 7.4(b).
8
9
Plaintiff needs additional pages to fully respond. In particular, addressing the specifics
relating to several web pages at issue here takes up additional space. In addition, the motion to
10
11
12
13
dismiss raises several distinct legal issues. Plaintiff submits that the briefing in his opposition
will be helpful to the Court in deciding each of the matters presented.
The cumulative effect of the space necessary to address the factual and legal contentions
14
raised by the motion is that Plaintiff will need in excess of the 25-page limit to fully respond.
15
Plaintiff also notes that the Local Rules afford Defendant a total of 40 pages (25 in the motion
16
and 15 in the reply) for presenting its position. Plaintiff seeks 5 additional pages.
17
II.
18
19
Accordingly, Plaintiff and eBay stipulate and request that the page limits for Plaintiff’s
20
opposition be enlarged to 30 pages.
21
AGREED:
22
By: /s/ Raymond E. Walker
Keith R. Verges
Parker D. Young
Raymond E. Walker
23
24
By: /s/ Whitty Somvichian
John C. Dwyer
Whitty Somvichian
James M. Penning
Kara C. Wilson
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS FOR PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
PAGE 2
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
3
4
Dated: December 9, 2011
5
6
7
8
United States District Judge
FILERS ATTESTATION:
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, 5X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of
perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
9
Dated: December 8, 2011
By: /s/ Raymond E. Walker
Raymond E. Walker
10
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
12
13
14
15
I hereby certify that all counsel of record will be served with a copy of this document via
the Court’s CM/ECF system pursuant to the local rules of this Court, on this 8thh day of
December, 2011.
16
17
/s/ Raymond E. Walker
Raymond E. Walker
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS FOR PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
PAGE 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?