Noll v. eBay, Inc et al

Filing 89

ORDER GRANTING 87 Stipulation Setting Briefing Schedule for eBay Inc.'s Response to Consolidated Complaint filed by eBay, Inc. eBay's response due 10/17/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/28/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)

Download PDF
5 6 7 8 COOLEY LLP WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) (wsomvichian@cooley.com) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 9 Attorneys for Defendant EBAY INC. 12 S RT 14 DERED O OR IT IS S NO 13 FIGARI & DAVENPORT, LLP KEITH R. VERGES (kverges@figdav.com)* PARKER D. YOUNG (parker.young@figdav.com)* RAYMOND E. WALKER (ray.walker@figdav.com* 901 Main Street, Suite 3400 Dallas, TX 75202 Telephone: (214) 939-2000 Facsimile: (214) 939-2090 *Admitted Pro Hac Vice UNIT ED 11 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL and Plaintiff/Intervenor RHYTHM MOTOR SPORTS, LLC 17 d wa J u d ge E ER rd J . D a H 15 RT U O 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 4 vila FO 3 LI 2 COOLEY LLP JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com) JAMES M. PENNING (229727) (jpenning@cooley.com) KARA C. WILSON (268535) (kwilson@cooley.com) Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 A 1 Additional attorneys listed on signature page N F D IS T IC T O R C 9/28/2012 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION 20 21 RICHARD NOLL, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No. 5:11 CV-04585 EJD 22 AND STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 23 24 RHYTM MOTOR SPORTS, LLC, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Courtroom: Judge: Trial Date: 25 Plaintiff/Intervenor, 26 27 28 Plaintiff, v. EBAY INC., Defendant. COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 4 Hon. Edward J. Davila None Set 1. STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT CV 11-04585-EJD 1 This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs Richard Noll (“Noll”) and Rhythm 2 Motor Sports LLC (“Rhythm”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and defendant eBay Inc. (“eBay”) 3 (Plaintiffs and eBay collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel. 4 WHEREAS, on September 4, 2012, the Court granted Rhythm’s motion to intervene and 5 ordered Rhythm to file its complaint in intervention (the “Rhythm Complaint”) by September 18, 6 2012 and Plaintiffs to file a consolidated complaint by October 2, 2012 [Docket No. 83]; 7 8 WHEREAS, on September 18, 2012, the Rhythm Complaint was filed in the abovecaptioned action [Docket No. 84]; 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs acknowledge that eBay need not file a separate response to the 10 Rhythm Complaint and will instead respond to all claims brought by Rhythm by filing a response 11 to the consolidated complaint to be filed in this matter. Plaintiffs acknowledge that by responding 12 to the consolidated complaint and not the Rhythm Complaint, eBay is not waiving or foregoing 13 any rights, defenses, or counterclaims it may have in connection with Rhythms claims; 14 WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-2, parties may stipulate in writing to request an 15 extension of time within which to respond to a motion to dismiss and for eBay to file a reply 16 thereto; 17 WHEREAS, extending the date for Plaintiffs to respond to a motion to dismiss and for 18 eBay to file a reply thereto as set forth below will not alter the date of any event or deadline 19 already fixed by Court order; 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 21 1. eBay need not respond to the Rhythm Complaint; 22 2. eBay, by responding to the consolidated complaint and not the Rhythm Complaint, 23 is not waiving or foregoing any rights, defenses, or counterclaims it may have in connection with 24 Rhythm’s claims; 25 26 27 28 3. eBay shall file its response to the consolidated complaint (answer, move, or otherwise respond) no later than October 17, 2012; 4. If eBay files a motion, Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed no later than November 2, 2012; and COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 2. STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT CV 11-04585-EJD 1 2 5. eBay shall file its reply in support of any such motion no later than November 16, 2012. 3 4 Dated: September 26, 2012 COOLEY LLP 5 /s/ James M. Penning JAMES M. PENNING (229727) 6 7 8 Attorneys For Defendant EBAY INC. Dated: September 26, 2012 FIGARI & DAVENPORT, LLP 9 10 /s/ Keith R. Verges KEITH R. VERGES 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL and Plaintiff/Intervenor RHYTHM MOTOR SPORTS, LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 3. STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT CV 11-04585-EJD 1 Additional attorneys: 2 LAW OFFICE OF SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD (leuthold@aol.com) 1671 The Alameda, Suite 303 San Jose, CA 95126 Telephone: (408) 924-0132 Facsimile: (408) 924-0134 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 THOMPSON & BROOKS VERA BROOKS (vbrooks@thompsonbrooks.com)* 412 E. Madison Street, Suite 900 Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 387-1822 Facsimile: (813) 387-1825 *Admitted Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL and Plaintiff/Intervenor RHYTHM MOTOR SPORTS, LLC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 4. STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT CV 11-04585-EJD 1 2 3 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatory. 4 /s/ James M. Penning 5 6 7 1062505 v1/HN 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 5. STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT CV 11-04585-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?