Noll v. eBay, Inc et al
Filing
89
ORDER GRANTING 87 Stipulation Setting Briefing Schedule for eBay Inc.'s Response to Consolidated Complaint filed by eBay, Inc. eBay's response due 10/17/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/28/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)
5
6
7
8
COOLEY LLP
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) (wsomvichian@cooley.com)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
9
Attorneys for Defendant EBAY INC.
12
S
RT
14
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
NO
13
FIGARI & DAVENPORT, LLP
KEITH R. VERGES (kverges@figdav.com)*
PARKER D. YOUNG (parker.young@figdav.com)*
RAYMOND E. WALKER (ray.walker@figdav.com*
901 Main Street, Suite 3400
Dallas, TX 75202
Telephone:
(214) 939-2000
Facsimile:
(214) 939-2090
*Admitted Pro Hac Vice
UNIT
ED
11
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL and
Plaintiff/Intervenor RHYTHM MOTOR SPORTS, LLC
17
d wa
J u d ge E
ER
rd J . D a
H
15
RT
U
O
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
4
vila
FO
3
LI
2
COOLEY LLP
JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com)
JAMES M. PENNING (229727) (jpenning@cooley.com)
KARA C. WILSON (268535) (kwilson@cooley.com)
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone:
(650) 843-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 849-7400
A
1
Additional attorneys listed on signature page
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9/28/2012
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION
20
21
RICHARD NOLL, Individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Case No. 5:11 CV-04585 EJD
22
AND
STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE
TO CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
23
24
RHYTM MOTOR SPORTS, LLC,
Individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated
Courtroom:
Judge:
Trial Date:
25
Plaintiff/Intervenor,
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
v.
EBAY INC.,
Defendant.
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
4
Hon. Edward J. Davila
None Set
1.
STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT
CV 11-04585-EJD
1
This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs Richard Noll (“Noll”) and Rhythm
2
Motor Sports LLC (“Rhythm”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and defendant eBay Inc. (“eBay”)
3
(Plaintiffs and eBay collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel.
4
WHEREAS, on September 4, 2012, the Court granted Rhythm’s motion to intervene and
5
ordered Rhythm to file its complaint in intervention (the “Rhythm Complaint”) by September 18,
6
2012 and Plaintiffs to file a consolidated complaint by October 2, 2012 [Docket No. 83];
7
8
WHEREAS, on September 18, 2012, the Rhythm Complaint was filed in the abovecaptioned action [Docket No. 84];
9
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs acknowledge that eBay need not file a separate response to the
10
Rhythm Complaint and will instead respond to all claims brought by Rhythm by filing a response
11
to the consolidated complaint to be filed in this matter. Plaintiffs acknowledge that by responding
12
to the consolidated complaint and not the Rhythm Complaint, eBay is not waiving or foregoing
13
any rights, defenses, or counterclaims it may have in connection with Rhythms claims;
14
WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-2, parties may stipulate in writing to request an
15
extension of time within which to respond to a motion to dismiss and for eBay to file a reply
16
thereto;
17
WHEREAS, extending the date for Plaintiffs to respond to a motion to dismiss and for
18
eBay to file a reply thereto as set forth below will not alter the date of any event or deadline
19
already fixed by Court order;
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
21
1. eBay need not respond to the Rhythm Complaint;
22
2. eBay, by responding to the consolidated complaint and not the Rhythm Complaint,
23
is not waiving or foregoing any rights, defenses, or counterclaims it may have in connection with
24
Rhythm’s claims;
25
26
27
28
3. eBay shall file its response to the consolidated complaint (answer, move, or
otherwise respond) no later than October 17, 2012;
4. If eBay files a motion, Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed no later than
November 2, 2012; and
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
2.
STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT
CV 11-04585-EJD
1
2
5. eBay shall file its reply in support of any such motion no later than
November 16, 2012.
3
4
Dated: September 26, 2012
COOLEY LLP
5
/s/ James M. Penning
JAMES M. PENNING (229727)
6
7
8
Attorneys For Defendant EBAY INC.
Dated: September 26, 2012
FIGARI & DAVENPORT, LLP
9
10
/s/ Keith R. Verges
KEITH R. VERGES
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL and
Plaintiff/Intervenor RHYTHM MOTOR SPORTS,
LLC
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
3.
STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT
CV 11-04585-EJD
1
Additional attorneys:
2
LAW OFFICE OF SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD
SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD (leuthold@aol.com)
1671 The Alameda, Suite 303
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: (408) 924-0132
Facsimile: (408) 924-0134
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
THOMPSON & BROOKS
VERA BROOKS (vbrooks@thompsonbrooks.com)*
412 E. Madison Street, Suite 900
Tampa, FL 33602
Telephone:
(813) 387-1822
Facsimile: (813) 387-1825
*Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD NOLL and
Plaintiff/Intervenor RHYTHM MOTOR SPORTS, LLC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
4.
STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT
CV 11-04585-EJD
1
2
3
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of
perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatory.
4
/s/ James M. Penning
5
6
7
1062505 v1/HN
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
5.
STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
EBAY INC.’S RESPONSE TO CONSOL. COMPLAINT
CV 11-04585-EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?