Berhane v. San Jose Hilton Hotel, Franchise Hilton Corporation
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 16 Stipulation filed by San Jose Hilton Hotel, Franchise Hilton Corporation. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 6, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)
I
2
3
4
5
o
7
William H. Emer. Bar No. 53482
WEmer@perkinscoie.com
Lauren T. Howard, Bar No. 227984
LHoward@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE I-Ip
1888.Century Park E., Suite 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721
Telephone: 310.788.9900
Facsimile: 310.788.3399
Attomeys for Defendant
PCCP DCP WEST HOTEL PARTNERS. LLC dba
SAN JOSE HILTON & TOWERS (erroneously sued
herein as San Jose Hilton Hotel)
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
o
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
l0
II
DAWITD. BERHANE,
Case
No. CVl1-04623 PSG
12
Plaintiff,
l3
t4
15
SAN JOSE HILTON HOTEL, Franchise
Hilton Corporation; and DOES 1 through
20, Inclusive,
16
Defendants.
l7
ASSIGNED FORALL PURPOSES TO THE
HON. PAUL S. GREWAL
IPROPOSEDI ORDER CONTTNUTNG
CASE MANAGEMENT CONF'ERENCE
Date: October 11,2011
Time: 2:00 o.m.
Courtroom:-5
Complaint Filed: August 17,201\ (originally
field in Santa Clara Superior Court)
Trial Date:
None set.
18
t9
20
2l
22
2J
24
zi
zo
27
28
51 687 -001 4 I LEG
AL2t847954.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
I
2
3
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and the Court finding good cause therefor, the
Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
l.
The Case Management Conference in the above captioned matter previously set
for hearing on October 11, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. shall be and is continued to November 15, 2011 at
5
6
2:00 p.m. in Department 5.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
'7
8
DATED:
October 6
2011
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
o
MAGISTRATE ruDGE FOR THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
1l
t2
IJ
14
15
t6
17
18
l9
20
2l
22
ZJ
.\^
25
27
28
576874014/LECAL2I 847954. I
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I
I am
2
a
citizen of the United States and employed in Los Angeles County, Califomia. I am
J
over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address
4
is 1888 Century Park 8., Suite 1700, Los Angeles, Califomia 90067-1721. I am readily familiar
)
with this firm's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the
6
United States Postal Service. On October 4, 201 l, I placed with this firm at the above address for
7
deposit with the United States Postal Service a true and conect copy of the within document(s):
8
IPROPOSEDI ORDER CONTINUTNG CASE
MANAGEMENT CONF'ERENCE
9
in a sealed envelope, postage fully paid, addressed as follows:
10
Charles R. Roe
Samuelson, Wilson & Roe
210 North Fourth Street, Suite 201
San Jose, CA 95 I 12
ll
t2
l-l
l4
l5
Following ordinary business practices, the envelope was sealed and placed for collection
and mailing on this date, and would, in the ordinary course ofbusiness, be deposited with the
United States Postal Service on this date.
t6
t7
Attomeys for Plaintiff
I declare that I am employed in the office of
a member
of the bar of this court at whose
direction the service was made.
18
Executed on October 4, 201 1, at Los Angeles, Califomia.
l9
20
21
22
z)
24
z)
26
27
28
5 1
687 40 | 4 ILEC AL2 | 841 9 54. I
PROOF OF SERVICE BY
MAIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?