Berhane v. San Jose Hilton Hotel, Franchise Hilton Corporation
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 22 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation filed by San Jose Hilton Hotel, Franchise Hilton Corporation. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on November 15, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COT]RT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAWIT D. BERHANE
CVI l-04623 PSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
SAN JOSE HILTON HOTEL; and DOES I
through 20, Inclusive
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil LR. I 6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The padies agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (AfR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Q,Iote: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably qore likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not fle this form. They must iwtead fle a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 168 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
the parties exchange
identifl process and provider)
to be determined a! a date after
Initial Disclosures and complcte preliminary discovery (including Plaintiffs deposition).
The padies agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (Ihe deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
refening the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline within
froln the date ofthe ord€r
filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket
e.9., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Early Nartral Evaluation (ENE)
Deadline for ADR session
90 days from the date ofthis order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?