Gill v. Palo Alto Police Department
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 1/17/2012. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 1/5/2012. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2012: # 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE) (ofr, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
RONALD GILL,
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PALO ALTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, )
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )
Case No.: C 11-4667 PSG
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On September 20, 2011, Plaintiff Ronald Gill (“Gill”) initiated this civil rights action against
19
Defendant Palo Alto Police Department (“Defendant”) and applied for leave to proceed in forma
20
pauperis. On December 9, 2011, the court denied Gill’s application on the ground that his complaint
21
failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, noting that Gill may amend his complaint
22
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). Gill has yet to amend his complaint or serve Defendant.1
23
24
On January 3, 2012, Plaintiff Ronald Gill (“Gill”) failed to appear for case management
conference. Gill also failed to file the required Case Management Conference Statement.2
25
26
27
28
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), Plaintiffs have not more than 120 days after the complaint is
filed to serve Defendants.
2
See Civil Local Rule 16-9; Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f).
ORDER, page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Furthermore, mail sent to Gill by court staff has been returned as undeliverable.3
Because Gill has not paid the required court fees to proceed, has not served process on
Defendant, and has not notified the court of a change of address, the court orders as follows.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Gill shall show cause in writing no later than January 17,
2012 why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than Friday, January 20, 2012, Gill must pay the
7
Northern District of California civil case filing fee and serve process on Defendant pursuant to Fed.
8
R. Civ. P. 4.
9
Failure to comply will result in dismissal of this action.
10
11
Dated: 1/5/2012
12
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3
28
Civ. L.R. 3-11 requires a party proceeding in pro se to promptly notify the court of any change
in address.
4
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
ORDER, page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?