Phillips v. Gipson
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; GRANTING 2 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the petition and all attach ments thereto on Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The Clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on Petitioner. Motions terminated: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alfonzo A. Phillips. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/10/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ALFONZO A. PHILLIPS,
Petitioner,
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
vs.
14
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
No. C 11-04707 EJD (PR)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;
GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
(Docket No. 2)
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at the Corcoran State Prison, has filed
19
a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his
20
state conviction. Petitioner has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma
21
pauperis. (Docket No. 2.)
22
23
24
BACKGROUND
According to the petition, Petitioner was found guilty by a jury in Alameda
25
County Superior Court of murder and attempted car-jacking. (Pet. at 2.) Petitioner
26
was sentenced to 28 years to life in state prison. (Id.)
27
28
Petitioner’s conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Petitioner filed the
instant federal habeas petition on September 21, 2011.
Order to Show Cause; Granting IFP
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.11\04707Phillips_osc&ifp.wpd
DISCUSSION
1
2
A.
Standard of Review
This court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a
3
4
person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that
5
he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United
6
States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a).
It shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show
7
8
cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that
9
the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” Id. § 2243.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
B.
Legal Claims
Petitioner raises the following claims for federal habeas relief: 1) the trial
12
court erred in excluding evidence of third party culpability; 2) the trial court erred in
13
admitting unduly suggestive and unreliable identification evidence; 3) the trial court
14
abused its discretion in excluding crime scene evidence to impeach witness’
15
testimony; 4) the trial court erred in excluding evidence of a witness’s bias; 5) the
16
trial court erred in excluding evidence of a police officer’s bias ; 6) prosecutorial
17
misconduct; and 7) cumulative error. Liberally construed, these claims appear
18
cognizable under § 2254 and merit an answer from Respondent.
19
CONCLUSION
20
21
For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown,
22
1.
23
24
Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket
No. 2), is GRANTED.
2.
The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the
25
petition and all attachments thereto on Respondent and Respondent’s attorney, the
26
Attorney General of the State of California. The Clerk also shall serve a copy of this
27
order on Petitioner.
28
3.
Respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner, within
Order to Show Cause; Granting IFP
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.11\04707Phillips_osc&ifp.wpd
2
1
sixty (60) days of the issuance of this order, an answer conforming in all respects to
2
Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of
3
habeas corpus should not be issued. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve
4
on Petitioner a copy of all portions of the state trial record that have been transcribed
5
previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the
6
petition.
7
If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a
8
traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty (30) days of his
9
receipt of the answer.
4.
Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules
12
Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall
13
file with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-
14
opposition within thirty (30) days of receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall
15
file with the court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen (15) days of receipt
16
of any opposition.
17
5.
Petitioner is reminded that all communications with the court must be
18
served on Respondent by mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent’s
19
counsel. Petitioner must also keep the Court and all parties informed of any change
20
of address.
21
This order terminates Docket No. 2.
22
23
DATED:
2/10/2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
Order to Show Cause; Granting IFP
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.11\04707Phillips_osc&ifp.wpd
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALFONZO A PHILLIPS,
Case Number: CV11-04707 EJD
Petitioner,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden,
Respondent.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
2/15/2012
That on
, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the
attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)
hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into
an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Alfonzo A. Phillips G-00520
State Prison Corcoran
P. O. Box 3466
Corcoran, CA 93212
Dated:
2/15/2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?