Higueret v. Brown et al

Filing 4

ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 10/14/11. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN HIGUERET, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 14 15 E.G. BROWN, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 11-4804 LHK (PR) ORDER OF TRANSFER 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner at High Desert State Prison, in Susanville, California, seeks 18 federal habeas review of the execution of his state sentence. Specifically, he is challenging 19 decisions made by the Board of Parole Hearings. Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the 20 district of conviction or the district of confinement. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). But the district of 21 confinement is the preferable forum to review the execution of a sentence. See Habeas L.R. 22 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Because High Desert State 23 Prison lies in the Eastern District of California, the Court orders that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 24 § 1404(a) and Habeas Local Rule 2254-3(b), and in the interest of justice, this petition be 25 transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 26 Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the 27 Eastern District of California, the district in which Petitioner is currently confined. See 28 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1). The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions Order of Transfer P:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\HC.11\Higueret804trans.wpd 1 2 3 and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10/14/11 DATED: _______________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Transfer P:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\HC.11\Higueret804trans.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?