Davis et al v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Motions terminated: (33 in 5:11-cv-04834-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook, Inc., (12 in 5:12-cv-00669-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (10 in 5:12-cv-00676-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extend Time to R espond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (14 in 5:12-cv-00798-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook, (14 in 5:12-cv-00799-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (5 in 5:12-cv-00800-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Ext end Time to Resond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (8 in 5:12-cv-00824-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Rspond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court f iled by Facebook Inc., (13 in 5:12-cv-00667-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time to Resond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (14 in 5:12-cv-00825-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Under Further Order filed by Facebook Inc., (25 in 5:12-cv-00797-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook, Inc., (18 in 5:12-cv-00796-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (10 in 5:12-cv-00801-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROP OSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (11 in 5:12-cv-00668-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Incorporated, (11 in 5:12-cv-00675-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (16 in 5:11-cv-049 35-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook, Inc., (8 in 5:12-cv-00673-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to I nitial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc., (16 in 5:12-cv-00674-EJD) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Until Further Order of the Court filed by Facebook Inc.. Joint Case Management Conference statement due 3/23/2012 Case Management Conference set for 3/30/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/8/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)

Download PDF
S Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. H ER a rd J . D R NIA dw J u d ge E avila FO RT 5 NO 4 A 3 D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO LI 7 2 UNIT ED 6 COOLEY LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) (brownmd@cooley.com) JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083) (jgutkin@cooley.com) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PERRIN AIKENS DAVIS, PETERSEN GROSS, DR. BRIAN K. LENTZ, TOMMASINA IANNUZZI, TRACY SAURO, JENNIFER SAURO, and LISA SABATO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, 21 FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware Corporation Defendant. LANA BRKIC, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 22 23 24 25 26 Related Case Nos.: 5:11-cv-04935-EJD; 5:12-cv-00370-EJD In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD v. 19 20 Case No. 5:11-cv-04834-EJD Plaintiff, Action Filed: September 30, 2011 Case No. 5:11-cv-04935-EJD Related Case Nos.: 5:11-cv-04834-EJD; 5:12-cv-00370-EJD In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD v. FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. Action Filed: October 5, 2011 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JULIAN CARROLL, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Related Case Nos.: 5:11-cv-04834EJD; 5:11-cv-04935-EJD In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Action Filed: January 24, 2012 ALEXANDRIA PARRISH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. 5:12-cv-00667-EJD 8 9 Case No. 5:12-cv-00370-EJD Plaintiff, In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD v. 10 FACEBOOK, INC., and DOES 1 Through 10, 11 Defendants. SHARON BEATTY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Action Filed: October 7, 2011 Transferred February 8, 2012 Case No. 5:12-cv-00668-EJD 12 13 14 In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Plaintiff, v. 15 FACEBOOK, INC., and DOES 1 Through 10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 BROOKE RUTLEDGE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 19 Action Filed: October 7, 2011 Transferred February 8, 2012 Plaintiff, 20 21 FACEBOOK, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, Action Filed: October 12, 2011 Transferred February 8, 2012 Defendants. JOHN GRAHAM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 24 25 In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD v. 22 23 Case No. 5:12-cv-00669-EJD Case No. 5:12-cv-00673-EJD In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Plaintiff, v. 26 FACEBOOK, INC., and DOES 1 Through 10, 27 Defendants. Action Filed: October 5, 2011 Transferred February 8, 2012 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 2. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 2 3 4 DAVID M. HOFFMAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. 5:12-cv-00674-EJD In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Plaintiff, v. 5 FACEBOOK, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. Action Filed: October 7, 2011 Transferred February 8, 2012 6 JANET SEAMON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. 5:12-cv-00675-EJD 7 8 9 10 In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, Action Filed: October 10, 2011 Transferred February 8, 2012 Defendants. 11 12 CHANDRA L. THOMPSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 13 Plaintiff, In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD FACEBOOK, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, Action Filed: September 30, 2011 Transferred February 8, 2012 14 15 Case No. 5:12-cv-00676-EJD v. 16 Defendants. 17 STEPHANIE CAMPBELL, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 18 Plaintiff, In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD FACEBOOK, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, Action Filed: November 21, 2011 Transferred February 17, 2012 19 20 21 v. Defendants. 22 23 CYNTHIA D. QUINN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 24 25 26 27 Case No. 5:12-cv-00796-EJD Case No. 5:12-cv-00797-EJD In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, Action Filed: October 18, 2011 Transferred February 17, 2012 Defendants. 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 3. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 2 3 4 JEANNE M. WALKER,Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 7 8 9 In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, 5 6 Case No. 5:12-cv-00798-EJD Action Filed: October 20, 2011 Transferred February 17, 2012 Defendants. JACQUELINE BURDICK,Individually and Case No. 5:12-cv-00799-EJD on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, 10 Action Filed: October 25, 2011 Transferred February 17, 2012 Defendants. 11 EDWARD STRAVATO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD v. FACEBOOK, INC.; JOHN DOE 1-10, Action Filed: December 14, 2011 Transferred February 17, 2012 Defendants. 15 16 Case No. 5:12-cv-00800-EJD 17 18 Case No. 5:12-cv-00801-EJD MATTHEW J. VICKERY, and Other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, 19 20 v. 23 Defendants. PATRICK K. MALONEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, 24 25 26 27 Action Filed: November 14, 2011 Transferred February 17, 2012 FACEBOOK, INC., DOES 1 thru 10, 21 22 In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Case No. 5:12-cv-00824-EJD In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD v. Action Filed: January 25, 2012 Transferred February 21, 2012 FACEBOOK, INC., DOES 1 THROUGH 10, Defendants. 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 4. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JOON KHANG, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. 5:12-cv-00825-EJD In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC., Action Filed: February 1, 2012 Transferred February 21, 2012 Defendant. JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT TO ALLOW FOR A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR ALL CASES TRANSFERRED BY THE MDL PANEL IN THE ACTION ENTITLED IN RE FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION CASE NO. 5:12-md-02314-EJD (CIV. L.R. 6-2) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, this Stipulation is entered into by and among the plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (collectively, the “Parties”) by and through their respective counsel. WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their initial Class Action Complaints (“Complaints”) between September 30, 2011 and February 1, 2012 (See Davis v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:11-cv-04834-EJD, Dkt. 1; Brkic v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:11-cv-04935-EJD, Dkt. 1; Carroll v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00370-EJD, Dkt. 1; Parrish v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00667-EJD, Dkt. 1; Beatty v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00668-EJD, Dkt. 1; Rutledge v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12cv-00669-EJD, Dkt. 1; Graham v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00673-EJD, Dkt. 1; Hoffman v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00674-EJD, Dkt. 1; Seamon v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00675EJD, Dkt. 1; Thompson v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00676-EJD, Dkt. 1; Campbell v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00796-EJD, Dkt. 1; Quinn v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00797EJD, Dkt. 1; Walker v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00798-EJD, Dkt. 1; Burdick v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00799-EJD, Dkt. 1; Stravato v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00800-EJD, Dkt. 1; Vickery v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00801-EJD, Dkt. 1; Maloney v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12cv-00824-EJD, Dkt. 1; and Khang v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00825-EJD, Dkt. 1); 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 5. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 WHEREAS Facebook has waived service of the Beatty, Carroll, Stravato, and Maloney 2 Complaints thereby extending Facebook’s time to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond 3 to those Complaints;1 4 WHEREAS the Parties in Davis, Brkic, Parrish, Rutledge, Graham, Hoffman, Seamon, 5 Thompson, Campbell, Quinn, Walker, Burdick, Vickery, and Khang have filed various motions 6 for stays or extensions of time in their various districts for Facebook to answer, move to dismiss, 7 or otherwise respond to the Complaints,2 which the courts have granted;3 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1 See Beatty v. Facebook, Inc., 5:12-cv-00668-EJD (service waived thereby extending Facebook’s response deadline to March 19, 2012); Carroll v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00370-EJD (service waived thereby extending Facebook’s response deadline to March 30, 2012); Stravato v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00800-EJD (service waived thereby extending Facebook’s response deadline to April 30, 2012); Maloney v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00824-EJD (service waived thereby extending Facebook’s response deadline to April 2, 2012). 2 See Davis v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:11-cv-04834-EJD, Dkt. 18; Brkic v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:11-cv-04935-EJD, Dkt. 1; Parrish v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00667-EJD, Dkt. 8; Rutledge v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00669-EJD, Dkt. 6; Graham v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv00673-EJD, Dkt. 3; Hoffman v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00674-EJD, Dkt. 5; Seamon v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00675-EJD, Dkt. 5; Thompson v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv00676-EJD, Dkt. 4; Campbell v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00796-EJD, Dkt. 8; Quinn v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00797-EJD, Dkt. 8; Walker v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00798EJD, Dkt. 4; Burdick v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00799-EJD, Dkt. 8; Vickery v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00801-EJD, Dkt. 5; and Khang v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00825-EJD, Dkt. 5. 3 See Davis v. Facebook, Inc., 5:11-cv-04834-EJD, Dkt. 19 (order granting a stay; response deadline of April 2, 2012); Brkic v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:11-cv-04935-EJD, Dkt. 13 (order staying case, response deadline of April 19, 2012); Parrish v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00667EJD, Dkt. 8 (order granting motion to stay, response deadline of March 22, 2012); Rutledge v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00669-EJD, Dkt. 7 (order staying case, response deadline pending further order by the court); Graham v. Facebook, Inc., 5:12-cv-00673-EJD, Dkt. 4 (order granting a stay; response deadline of April 9, 2012); Hoffman v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00674-EJD, Dkt. 11 (order granting a stay; response deadline of April 9, 2012); Seamon v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00675-EJD, Dkt. 6 (order granting stay of proceedings; response deadline of March 30, 2012); Thompson v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00676-EJD, Dkt. 6 (order granting joint motion to stay; response deadline of April 2, 2012); Campbell v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv00796-EJD, Dkt. 12 (order granting joint motion for a stay; response deadline of March 26, 2012); Quinn v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00797-EJD, Dkt. 14 (order granting stay of proceedings; response deadline of March 19, 2012); Walker v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv00798-EJD, Dkt. 8 (order granting motion to stay proceeding; response deadline of April 2, 2012); Burdick v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00799-EJD, Dkt. 10 (order granting stay of proceedings; response deadline of April 2, 2012); Vickery v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00801EJD, Dkt. 6 (order to stay action; response deadline of April 3, 2012); and Khang v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00825-EJD, Dkt. 8 (order granting a stay; response deadline of May 10, 2012). 6. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 2 WHEREAS the current deadlines for Facebook to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the Complaints are between March 19, 2012 and May 10, 2012; 3 4 WHEREAS under Civil Local Rule 6-2, parties may stipulate in writing to extend the time within which to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the Complaints; 5 WHEREAS extending the date for Facebook to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise 6 respond to the Complaints in the above-captioned actions until further order of this Court will not 7 alter the date of any events or deadlines already fixed by Court order and will allow for an 8 omnibus Case Management Conference (“CMC”) for all cases transferred to the Northern District 9 of California by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”) in 10 the action entitled In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation, MDL No. 2314 (the “MDL 11 Cases”) assigned case no. 5:12-md-02314-EJD); 12 13 WHEREAS a CMC has been set by the Court for March 30, 2012 at 1:30pm in the abovecaptioned cases with a joint CMC statement due on March 23, 20124; 14 WHEREAS extending the date for Facebook to file responsive pleadings will promote 15 judicial efficiency and conserve party resources by allowing an initial CMC in which all parties in 16 the MDL Cases will have the opportunity to receive the Court’s guidance and instruction as to, 17 inter alia, whether a consolidated, amended complaint covering all the transferred actions should 18 be prepared and how best to structure and schedule initial motion practice; 19 WHEREAS without this extension, the individual cases would proceed on separate tracks 20 for initial motion practice, as Facebook will be forced to respond to the Complaints before a 21 CMC, and such responses (and any oppositions or replies to those initial motion practices filed by 22 Plaintiffs or Facebook) would later be entirely mooted if a consolidated, amended complaint were 23 filed; 24 25 WHEREAS the brief extension of time requested here will have no effect on the overall schedule of the above-captioned case; 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 4 See In re: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation, 5:12-md-02314-EJD, Dkt. 2. 7. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 WHEREAS on February 23, 2012, Facebook filed a joint stipulation to extend time to 2 respond to initial complaint until further order of the court in Howard v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3 5:12-cv-00671-EJD, also pending in In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation, No. 5:12-md- 4 02314-EJD, which the Court granted on February 24, 2012;5 5 WHEREAS courts that have presided over multiple cases transferred through MDL Panel 6 proceedings have routinely issued orders that establish uniform dates for filings in consolidated 7 pretrial proceedings, (an example of which is provided as Exhibit I to the supporting Declaration 8 of Amy E. Nash); 9 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 10 11 1. Facebook's deadline to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in each action is continued until further order of the Court; and 12 2. The CMC’s in Davis, et al. v. Facebook Inc., 5:11-cv-04834-EJD, previously set 13 for March 30, 2012 at 10:00am, see Dkt. 27, and Carroll v. Facebook Inc., 5:12-cv-00370-EJD, 14 also previously set for March 30, 2012 at 10:00am, see Dkt. 11, are hereby cancelled in lieu of the 15 CMC now scheduled in In re: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation, 5:12-md-02314-EJD, on shall be rescheduled to March 30, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., if not March 30, 2012 at 1:30pm. already scheduled accordingly. 16 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 6, 2012 COOLEY LLP 19 20 /s/ Jeffrey M. Gutkin Jeffrey M. Gutkin (216083) 21 Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 5 See Howard v. Facebook, Inc., No. 5:12-cv-00671-EJD, Dkt. 29. 8. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 Dated: March 6, 2012 SIANNI & STRAITE LLP 2 3 /s/ David A. Straite David A. Straite 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Barry R. Eichen Daryl L. Zaslow EICHEN CRUTCHLOW ZASLOW & McELROY LLP 40 Ethel Road Edison, NJ 08817 beichen@njadvocates.com dzaslow@njadvocates.com Telephone: (732) 777-0100 Facsimile: (732) 248-8273 Paul R. Kiesel KIESEL BOUCHER LARSON LLP 8648 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, CA 90211 kiesel@kbla.com Telephone: (310) 854-4444 Facsimile: (310)854-0812 15 16 Stephen G. Grygiel John E Keefe, Jr. Stephen Sullivan, Jr. KEEFE BARTELS LLP 170 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701 sgrygiel@keefebartels.com jkeefe@keefebartels.com ssullivan@keefebartels.com Telephone: (732) 224-9400 Facsimile: (732) 224-9494 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PERRIN AIKENS DAVIS, PETERSEN GROSS, DR. BRIAN K. LENTZ, TOMMASINA IANNUZZI, TRACY SAURO, JENNIFER SAURO, and LISA SABATO 17 18 19 David A. Straite Ralph N. Sianni 1201 N. Orange St., Suite 740 Wilmington, DE 19801 dstraite@siannistraite.com rsianni@siannistraite.com Telephone: (302) 573-3560 Facsimile: (302) 358-2975 Dated: March 6, 2012 WILLOUGHBY DOYLE LLP 20 21 22 /s/ Conal Fergus Doyle Conal Fergus Doyle 25 433 North Camden Drive, Suite 730 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 conal@willoughbydoyle.com Telephone: (310) 385-0567 Facsimile: (310) 842-1496 26 Attorney for Plaintiff LANA BRKIC 23 24 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 9. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 Dated: March 6, 2012 THE TERRELL LAW GROUP 2 3 /s/ Reginald Terrell Reginald Terrell 4 Post Office Box 13315, PMB #148 Oakland, CA 94661 reggiet2@aol.com Telephone: (510)-237-9700 Facsimile: (510)-237-4616 5 6 7 8 9 Attorney for Plaintiff JULIAN CARROLL Dated: March 6, 2012 10 BURNS CUNNINGHAM & MACKEY PC /s/ William M. Cunningham, Jr. William M. Cunningham, Jr. 11 12 16 Peter S. Mackey Peter F. Burns P.O. Box 1583 Mobile, AL 36633 pfburns@bcmlawyers.com psmackey@bcmlawyers.com wmcunningham@bcmlawyers.com Telephone: (251) 432-0612 Facsimile: (251) 432-0625 17 Attorney for Plaintiff ALEXANDRIA PARRISH 13 14 15 18 Dated: March 6, 2012 GRANT WOODS PC 19 20 21 /s/ Grant Woods Grant Woods 24 Two Renaissance Square 40 N. Central Ave., Suite 2250 Phoenix, AZ 85004 gw@grantwoodspc.net Telephone: (602) 258-2599 Facsimile: (602) 258-5070 25 Attorney for Plaintiff SHARON BEATTY 22 23 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 10. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 Dated: March 6, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID SHELTON PLLC 2 3 /s/ David Shelton David Shelton 4 P.O. Box 2541 Oxford, MS 38655 david@davidsheltonpllc.com Telephone: (662) 281-1212 Facsimile: (662) 281-1312 5 6 7 8 9 Attorney for Plaintiff BROOKE RUTLEDGE Dated: March 6, 2012 BARTIMUS, FRICKLETON, ROBERTSON & GORNY – LEAWOOD 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Andrew J. Lyskowski Erik A. Bergmanis BERGMANIS LAW FIRM, L.L.C. 380 W. Hwy. 54, Suite 201 P.O. Box 229 Camdenton, MO 65020 alyskowski@ozarklawcenter.com erik@ozarklawcenter.com Telephone: (573) 346-2111 Facsimile: (573) 346-5885 Dated: March 6, 2012 /s/ Chip Robertson Chip Robertson Michelle L. Marvel Stephen M. Gorny 11150 Overbrook Road, Suite 200 Leawood, KS 66211 steve@bflawfirm.com mmarvel@bflawfirm.com Telephone: (913) 266-2300 Facsimile: (913) 266-2366 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN GRAHAM BRYANT LAW CENTER, PSC 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /s/ Mark P. Bryant Mark P. Bryant Emily Ward Roark 601 Washington Street P.O. Box 1876 Paducah, KY 42002 emily.roark@bryantpsc.com mark.bryant@bryantpsc.com Telephone: (270) 442-1422 Facsimile: (270) 443-8788 Attorney for Plaintiff DAVID M. HOFFMAN 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 11. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 Dated: March 6, 2012 HYMEL, DAVIS & PETERSEN, LLC 2 3 /s/ Michael Reese Davis Michael Reese Davis 4 L. J. Hymel Richard P. Ieyoub Tim P. Hartdegen 10602 Coursey Blvd. Baton Rouge, LA 70816 rieyoub@hymeldavis.com ljhymel@hymeldavis.com mdavis@hymeldavis.com thartdegen@hymeldavis.com Telephone: (225) 298-8188 Facsimile: (225) 298-8119 5 6 7 8 9 10 Attorney for Plaintiff JANET SEAMON 11 12 Dated: March 6, 2012 BARNES & ASSOCIATES 13 /s/ Randall O. Barnes Randall O. Barnes 14 15 219 East Dunklin Street, Suite A Jefferson City, MO 65101 rbarnesjclaw@aol.com Telephone: (573) 634-8884 Facsimile: (573) 635-6291 19 Andrew Lyskowski BERGMANIS & MCDUFFEY 380 W. Hwy 54, Suite 201 P.O. Box 229 Camdenton, MO 65020 alyskowski@ozarklawcenter.com Telephone: (573) 346-2111 Facsimile: (573) 346-5885 20 Dated: March 6, 2012 BRIAN L. CAMPBELL LAW FIRM, PLLC /s/ Grant Rahmeyer Grant Rahmeyer /s/ Brian Lee Campbell Brian Lee Campbell STRONG-GARNER-BAUER, P.C. 415 East Chestnut Expressway Springfield, MO 65802 Grahmeyer@stronglaw.com Telephone: (417)-887-4300 Facsimile: (417)-88704385 P.O. Box 189 Pea Ridge, AR 72751 blcampb@hotmail.com Telephone: (479) 387-1081 Facsimile: (888) 389-5809 16 17 18 Attorney for Plaintiff CHANDRA L. THOMPSON 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Attorney for Plaintiff STEPHANIE CAMPBELL 12. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 Dated: March 6, 2012 BRONSTER HOSHIBATA 2 3 /s/ Robert M. Hatch Robert M. Hatch 4 Margery S. Bronster 1003 Bishop Street, Suite 2300 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 rhatch@bhhawaii.net mbronster@bhhawaii.net Telephone: (808) 524-5644 Facsimile: (808) 599-1881 5 6 7 8 9 10 Attorney for Plaintiff CYNTHIA D. QUINN Dated: March 6, 2012 11 ELIZABETH CUNNINGHAM THOMAS PLLC /s/ Elizabeth C. Thomas Elizabeth C. Thomas 12 13 15 P.O. Box 8946 Missoula, MT 59802 elizthomas@bresnan.net Telephone: (406)-728-5936 Facsimile: (406)-728-2828 16 Attorney for Plaintiff JEANNE M. WALKER 14 17 Dated: March 6, 2012 MEYER & LEONARD PLLC 18 19 20 /s/ Henry A. Meyer, III Henry A. Meyer, III 23 116 E Sheridan, Suite 207 Oklahoma City, OK 73104 hameyer@mac.com Telephone: (405)-702-9900 Facsimile: (405)-605-8381 24 Attorney for Plaintiff JACQUELINE BURDICK 21 22 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 13. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 Dated: March 6, 2012 MANDELL, SCHWARTZ & BOISCLAIR, LTD. 2 3 /s/ Zachary Mandell ______ Zachary Mandell 4 8 Michael S. Schwartz Mark S. Mandell 1 Park Row Providence, RI 02903 msmandell@msn.com mschwartz.ri@gmail.com Telephone: (401) 273-8330 Facsimile: (401) 751-7830 9 Attorney for Plaintiff EDWARD STRAVATO 5 6 7 10 Dated: March 6, 2012 HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON 11 12 13 14 /s/ Michael Ramsey Scott Michael Ramsey Scott 17 Louis David Peterson 1221 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101-2925 ldp@hcmp.com mrs@hcmp.com Telephone: (206)-623-1745 Facsimile: (206) 623-7789 18 Attorney for Plaintiff MATTHEW J. VICKERY 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 14. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 Dated: March 6, 2012 METZ, BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN 2 3 /s/ Michael J. Ensminger Michael J. Ensminger 4 Kyle I. Stroh Michael K. Fultz 33 East Schrock Road Westerville, OH 43081 mfultz@metzbailey.com kstroh@metzbailey.com Telephone: (614)-882-2327 Facsimile: (614)-882-5150 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorney for Plaintiff PATRICK K. MALONEY Dated: March 6, 2012 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP Jon A. Tostrud TOSTRUD LAW GROUP, P.C. 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 jtostrud@tostrudlaw.com Telephone: (310) 278-2600 Facsimile: (310) 278-2640 /s/ Marc L. Godino Marc L. Godino Lionel Z. Glancy 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311 Los Angeles, California 90067 mgodino@glancylaw.com Telephone: (310) 201-9150 Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Attorney for Plaintiff JOON KHANG 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 15. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD ATTESTATION 1 2 I, Jeffrey M. Gutkin, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 STIPULATION 4 THE COURT TO ALLOW FOR A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR ALL CASES TRANSFERRED BY 5 THE 6 MDL NO. 2314 (CIV. L.R. 6-2) 7 indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document . TO EXTEND TIME MDL PANEL IN THE TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF ACTION ENTITLED IN RE FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION, I hereby attest that I have the concurrences for any signatures 8 9 /s/ Jeffrey M. Gutkin Jeffrey M. Gutkin 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 16. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (FRCP 5) 2 3 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document, together with the [PROPOSED] 4 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5 UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT TO ALLOW FOR A CASE MANAGEMENT 6 CONFERENCE FOR ALL CASES TRANSFERRED BY THE MDL PANEL IN THE ACTION 7 ENTITLED IN RE FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION CASE NO. 5:12-MD-02314- 8 EJD (Civ. L.R. 6-2) was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic 9 service in each of the cases captioned Local Rule CV 5(a). /s/ Amy E. Nash Amy E. Nash 10 11 12 13 1011818 /HN 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 17. STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 5:11-CV-04834 –EJD AND CASES IN 5:12-MD-02314-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?