Nunez et al v. F/V Vengeance et al

Filing 16

ORDER re 15 Stipulation, filed by Benedict A. Ferrante, F/V Vengeance. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/17/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Case5:11-cv-04842-LHK Document15 Filed01/13/12 Page1 of 3

1 Lawrence E. Biegel (State Bar No. 044426)
Vicki Schermer-Kleinkopf(StateBarNo. 116673)
2 Joseph Cisneros (State Bar No. 184907)
THE BIEGEL LAW FIRM
3 2801 Monterey-Salinas Highway, Suite A
Monterey, CA 93940
4

Telephone:
5 Facsnnile:

[phone]
[phone]

6 Attorneys for Defendants
Benedict A. Nunez and FN Vengeance
7
8
9

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13

JOSEPH NUNEZ AND EDWARD
14 NUNEZ,

Case No: CV 11-04842 - LHK

15

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
ANSWER

Plaintiffs,
16 vs.
17

FN VENGEANCE, BENEDICT
18 FERRANTE and Does 1-100, inclusive,

19

Defendants.

20
21

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiffs Joseph

22 Nunez and Edward Nunez, by and through their attorney of record Daniel Cull em, and
23

defendants FN Vengeance and Benedict Ferrante by and through their attorneys of record,

24 Lawrence E. Biegel, Vicki Schermer-Kleinkopf and Joseph A. Cisneros that:
25

WHEREAS the parties are very actively engaged in settlement discussions and have

26 reached an agreement in principle, and
27
28

WHEREAS plaintiffs and defendants are both hopeful that a settlement agreement will
be fmalized shortly, and
1

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
Nunez v. FN Vengeance et. a/., U.S. District Court Northern District, CA, Case No. CV 11-04842

Case5:11-cv-04842-LHK Document15 Filed01/13/12 Page2 of 3

1

WHEREAS the defendants have a

2

WHEREAS defendants have not sought 01'

pleading due on

3 respond and thus r~pectfully request that the Court i

17,2012; and

any previOUS

. an additional'two

4 time up to and including Jauuary 31, 2012, to allQw;

of tUlle to
elf.tellliiofl of
the settlement

5 documents and/or 'allow defendant to file an

6

through their

IT IS HEREBV RESPECTFUU Y

7 respective counsel, that the Coun grallt the

up to and

8 including January 31, 2012 by which to file a

pleading so as to

9 continue their settlement diseussions and hopefully !

the parties to

tbis Inatter.

10

11 Dated: January 12,2012

THE BIE!qEl" LAW FIRM

12
13
14
15
16

17

for defendants
TTC)Bl'~E~ AT LAW

Dated: January 12, 2012

18

19
20
21

22
23
24

2S
26
27
28
2

STIPlJ"LAnON ANI) PROPOSE!)
Nunez v. FIV

Vlln~ance

el. a/., U.S. District Cowt

TIME TO
P/.lliel. CA, eQse No, CV h .a'484~

Case5:11-cv-04842-LHK Document15 Filed01/13/12 Page3 of 3

1

PROPOSED ORDER

2

Based upon the stipulation of counsel and good cause appearing therefor,

3

IT IS ORDERED that the time for defendants to file a responsive pleading in this matter

4

shall be extended two weeks and that defendants shall have up to and including January 31, 2012

5 within which to file such a pleading.
6
_ _ _ 17, 2012
7 Dated:_January__ _ _ __
8

LUCY H.KOH
United States District Judge

9

10
11

12

13

14

15
16

17

18
19
20
21
22

23
24

25

26
27

28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
Nunez v. FN Vengeance et. a/., U.S. District Court Northern District, CA, Case No. CV 11-04842