Nunez et al v. F/V Vengeance et al
Filing
7
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 2 Ex Parte Application (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
JOSEPH NUNEZ and EDWARD NUNEZ,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
F/V VENGEANCE; BENNIE FERRANTE; and )
DOES 1-100, Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-04842-LHK
ORDER ISSUING WARRANT FOR THE
ARREST OF THE F/V VENGEANCE
15
Joseph and Edward Nunez come to Court seeking Vengeance. On September 30, 2011,
16
Plaintiffs Joseph and Edward Nunez’s (Plaintiffs) filed a verified complaint seeking an arrest
17
warrant for the fishing vessel Vengence. On November 17, 2008, Plaintiffs loaned Benedict A.
18
Ferrante $60,000 in exchange for a promise to repay and a mortgage executed on Ferrante’s fishing
19
vessel Vengeance and its Transferrable Market Squid Light Boat Permit (TMSLBP). See Compl.
20
at 2; see also Joseph Nunez Decl. ¶ 2, Ex. A (the mortgage note). The Plaintiffs further allege that
21
on January 1, 2011, Ferrante defaulted on the loan, and that they foreclosed the mortgage on
22
January 18, 2011. Plaintiffs delivered the Coast Guard documentation of the foreclosure to
23
Ferrante on January 21, 2011. Joseph Nunez Decl. ¶¶ 5, 7. Plaintiffs allege that Ferrante is aware
24
of the foreclosure because he sent a protest letter disputing it in March 2011. On September 28,
25
2011, Ferrante moved Vengeance to a boat slip in Monterey Harbor, Monterey, CA with the stated
26
intention of “making some repairs” and then “heading south.” See Compl. ¶¶ 2-3.
27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-04842-LHK
ORDER ISSUING WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF THE F/V VENGEANCE
1
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rule for Certain Admiralty and
Maritime Claims C an action in rem may be brought to enforce any maritime lien such as a
3
mortgage. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc., Suppl. R. C(1). Such a complaint must be verified, describe
4
with reasonable particularity the property that is the subject of the action, and state that the
5
property is within the district or will be within the district while the action is pending.1 See id.
6
C(2). Before issuing an arrest warrant, the Court must review the complaint and any supporting
7
papers and if the conditions for an in rem action appear to exist, the court must issue an order
8
directing the clerk to issue a warrant for the arrest of the vessel or other property that is the subject
9
of the action. Id. C(3)(a)(i). The Advisory Committee Note on the Amendments to Rules, 105
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
2
F.R.D. 179, 233 (1985), contemplates “a simple order with conclusory findings” determining
11
whether the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing that the action in rem is warranted.
12
Plaintiffs have adequately alleged the conditions for an in rem action with regard to the
13
boat, and have provided the mortgage agreement, a verified complaint, and Joseph Nunez’s sworn
14
declaration that the F/V Vengeance was properly foreclosed upon. Moreover, Plaintiffs have stated
15
that the F/V Vengence is currently within this district in a boat slip in Monterey Harbor. Plaintiffs
16
further allege that the TMSLPB is an appurtenance of the Vengeance. The Court agrees, in accord
17
with Gowen, Inc. v. F/V Quality One, 244 F.3d 64 (1st Cir. 2001).
18
Thus, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for an Order Issuing
19
Warrant for the Arrest of the F/V Vengeance, and ISSUES A WARRANT for the ARREST of the
20
F/V Vengeance, Official Number 570025.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated: September 30, 2011
23
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
No advance notice to the boat owner is required to issue this arrest warrant. See Polar Shipping, Ltd. v. Oriental
Shipping Corp., 680 F.2d 627, 637-38 (9th Cir. 1982).
2
Case No.: 11-CV-04842-LHK
ORDER ISSUING WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF THE F/V VENGEANCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?