Henderson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al

Filing 113

JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/21/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 DR. SHAMPAIN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 11-4918 RMW (PR) JUDGMENT The court has granted defendant Dr. Shampain’s motion for summary judgment. The 18 court previously granted defendant M. Espinoza’s motion for summary judgment on March 27, 19 2013 (docket no. 70), and granted defendant Dr. Yu’s motion to dismiss on September 20, 2013 20 (docket no. 89). Judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. The 21 Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: _________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 Judgment P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.11\Henderson918jud.wpd UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CURTIS LEE HENDERSON SR., Case Number: CV11-04918 RMW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. DR. SHAMPAIN, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on November 21, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Curtis Lee Henderson H-43488 California State Prison A2-107 P.O. Box 409020 Ione, CA 95640 Dated: November 21, 2014 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?