Henderson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
Filing
113
JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/21/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CURTIS LEE HENDERSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
DR. SHAMPAIN,
15
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 11-4918 RMW (PR)
JUDGMENT
The court has granted defendant Dr. Shampain’s motion for summary judgment. The
18
court previously granted defendant M. Espinoza’s motion for summary judgment on March 27,
19
2013 (docket no. 70), and granted defendant Dr. Yu’s motion to dismiss on September 20, 2013
20
(docket no. 89). Judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. The
21
Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
Judgment
P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.11\Henderson918jud.wpd
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CURTIS LEE HENDERSON SR.,
Case Number: CV11-04918 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
DR. SHAMPAIN,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on November 21, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Curtis Lee Henderson H-43488
California State Prison
A2-107
P.O. Box 409020
Ione, CA 95640
Dated: November 21, 2014
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?