Burkes v. County Of Monterey
Filing
19
ORDER Denying 17 , 18 Parties' Requests for Telephonic Appearance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/2/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)
1
2
*E-FILED 12-02-2011*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
13
14
No. C11-04952 HRL
MARK S. BURKES,
ORDER DENYING PARTIES’
REQUESTS FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE
Plaintiff,
v.
[Re: Docket Nos. 17, 18]
COUNTY OF MONTEREY,
15
Defendant.
/
16
17
The court previously denied defendant’s request for leave to appear by phone at the
18
December 6, 2011 initial case management conference. Defendant has filed a renewed request
19
for telephonic appearance; and, plaintiff also now requests leave to appear by phone at the
20
conference.
21
The parties’ Joint Case Management Statement indicates that they dispute several basic
22
procedural matters, which the court hopes may be resolved (or at least narrowed) through
23
focused discussion at the conference. Accordingly, both parties’ requests for telephonic
24
appearance are denied. Counsel most knowledgeable about the issues raised in the parties’
25
Joint Case Management Statement shall attend the conference in person.
26
27
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 2, 2011
28
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:11-cv-04952-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Dennis Gary McCarthy
3
Gary Ernest Gray
4
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
DMcCarthy@FentonKeller.com
ggray@ggraylaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?