Burkes v. County Of Monterey

Filing 19

ORDER Denying 17 , 18 Parties' Requests for Telephonic Appearance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/2/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED 12-02-2011* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 No. C11-04952 HRL MARK S. BURKES, ORDER DENYING PARTIES’ REQUESTS FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE Plaintiff, v. [Re: Docket Nos. 17, 18] COUNTY OF MONTEREY, 15 Defendant. / 16 17 The court previously denied defendant’s request for leave to appear by phone at the 18 December 6, 2011 initial case management conference. Defendant has filed a renewed request 19 for telephonic appearance; and, plaintiff also now requests leave to appear by phone at the 20 conference. 21 The parties’ Joint Case Management Statement indicates that they dispute several basic 22 procedural matters, which the court hopes may be resolved (or at least narrowed) through 23 focused discussion at the conference. Accordingly, both parties’ requests for telephonic 24 appearance are denied. Counsel most knowledgeable about the issues raised in the parties’ 25 Joint Case Management Statement shall attend the conference in person. 26 27 SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2011 28 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:11-cv-04952-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Dennis Gary McCarthy 3 Gary Ernest Gray 4 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. DMcCarthy@FentonKeller.com ggray@ggraylaw.com 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?