Foley et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PARTIES' MOTIONS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407 re 21 Proposed Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case is STAYED until either (1) 30 days after the MDL panel has issued a ruling on the cur rently pending motion for coordination or consolidation, or (2) March 30, 2012, whichever date occurs earlier. The parties may apply to lift or extend this stay at any time should the circumstances so require. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/17/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

J. David Bickham (SBN 145449)
Email: [e-mail]
Claire Hass (SBN 253868)
Email: [e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second St., Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

e>

"'
~
Q)

Cl

'0
Q)

c..

...J
...J

J:
1-

~

1U
ii5
.£
'0
Q)

13

Plaintiff(s),

E

,Q.

0

~

0:::

RAMONA FOLEY and KEVIN FOLEY,

Case No.: 11cv5014 EJD
Before the Honorable Edward J. Davila

Q

(/)

w
w

12

Q)

s

~
a.
"'

g
:.0
:m
]l
~
<(

14
15
16
17

vs.
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION
OF THE PARTIES' MOTIONS PURSUANT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407

Defendant(s).
Compl. Filed:
Trial Date:

October 11, 2011
None Set

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11 CV 5014 EJD
[PROPOSED) ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PARTIES'
MOTIONS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407

1

After full consideration of the parties' Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending

2

Resolution ofthe Parties' Motions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the accompanying Request for

3

Judicial Notice in support of the Stipulation, and good cause appearing:

4

6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case is STAYED until either (1) 30 days after the MDL panel
has issued a ruling HEREBY ORDERED that this action iscoordination or the Judicial Panel on
IT IS on the currently pending motion for stayed pending consolidation, or (2)
March 30, 2012, whichever date occurs earlier. The parties may apply to lift or extend this
Multidistrict Litigation's the circumstances so to transfer
stay at any time shouldresolution of the motionsrequire. for coordinated or consolidated pretrial

7

The Clerk shall admistratively close this file.
proceedings before it.

5

8
9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
!!!

"'
.,

3:
.!!!
0

11

January 17

DATED: _ _ _ __ _ , 2012.

0
2
J'l

a..
....1
....1

(/)

~

,<;;

J:

I- al
E
:ll .g

(/)

Cl
UJ
UJ

a:::

12

i

13

The Honorable Edward J. Davila

14

<:

"'
~

~

:0
±11

al

·'
"
Jii
<(

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11 CV 5014 EJD
- 1[PROPOSED) ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PARTIES'
MOTIONS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407