International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No.332 v. Brown and Fesler, Inc
Filing
29
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Settlement. Plaintiff's summary judgment motion is terminated without prejudice. Stipulated dismissal due by 8/31/2012. If dismissal not filed by that date, then Show Cause Response due by 9/4/2012 and Show Cause Hearing set for 9/11/2012 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/30/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2012)
1
2
*E-FILED: July 30, 2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
No. C11-05048 HRL
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION
NO. 332,
13
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
SETTLEMENT
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
BROWN & FESLER, INC., a California
corporation,
17
Defendant.
/
18
19
The parties having advised that their settlement agreement has been finalized, plaintiff’s
20
summary judgment motion will be administratively terminated, without prejudice to plaintiff to
21
re-notice the motion if it becomes necessary or appropriate.
22
On or before August 31, 2012, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to
23
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, the parties shall appear in
24
Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose,
25
California on September 11, 2012, 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why the case should not
26
be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). The parties shall file a statement in response to
27
this Order to Show Cause no later than September 4, 2012. The joint statement shall state
28
1
(1) the status of the activities of the parties in finalizing settlement; and (2) how much
2
additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a
3
stipulated dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically
4
vacated and the parties need not file a joint statement in response to this Order.
5
6
SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 30, 2012
7
________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
8
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
5:11-cv-05048-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
John Charles Post
3
Mark Stephen Renner
4
Richard Hill
jpost@littler.com, ntorres@littler.com, sferrell@littler.com
mrenner@wmprlaw.com, jchargin@wmprlaw.com
rhill@littler.com, sbecerra@littler.com
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?