Bei v. Santucci
Filing
10
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A "CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE," OR ELSE A "DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT." Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on November 29, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
NORMAN BEI,
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
)
NICHOLAS SANTUCCI,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
Case No.: C 11-05061 PSG
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES
TO FILE EITHER A “CONSENT TO
PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE,” OR ELSE A
“DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT”
17
18
On November 15, 2011, Defendant Nicholas Santucci moved to dismiss. This case has been
19
assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge. Before the court takes any further action in the case,
20
the court must determine whether or not all of the parties who have appeared consent to magistrate
21
judge jurisdiction by the undersigned, or whether any of the parties request reassignment to a district
22
judge. Therefore,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than December 5, 2011, each party shall file either
24
a “Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or else a “Declination to Proceed
25
Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment.” Both forms are available
26
from the Clerk of the Court, or from the Forms (Civil) section of the court’s website at
27
28
Case No. C 11-5061 PSG
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE RE CONSENT OR DECLINATION
1
1
www.cand.uscourts.gov.
2
Dated: November 29, 2011
3
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 11-5061 PSG
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE RE CONSENT OR DECLINATION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?