Barragan v. Santa Clara County Housing Authority

Filing 6

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed. Show Cause Response due by 12/30/2011. 11/29/2011 initial case management conference is vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/23/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)

1
*E-FILED 11-23-2011*

2
3
4
5
6

NOT FOR CITATION

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

7

FRANCES BARRAGAN,

No. C11-05070 HRL

Plaintiff,

12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v.
13
14

SANTA CLARA HOUSING AUTHORITY;
DOES 1-100,
Defendants.

15

/
16
17

Frances Barragan previously filed an unsigned application to proceed in forma pauperis.

18

The court issued an interim order directing her to file a signed application by November 1,

19

2011. (Dkt. No. 5). She has not done so.1
Accordingly, no later than December 30, 2011, Barragan shall file a response to this

20
21

order, explaining why this case should not be dismissed for her apparent inattention to it. The

22

initial case management conference set for November 29, 2011 is vacated.
SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: November 23, 2011

25
HOWARD R. LLOYD
26

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
According to the complaint, Barragan is illiterate. Inasmuch as the court’s
rulings are issued in writing, however, Barragan reasonably is expected to have some means
of learning what the court wishes to communicate to her in its orders.
1

1

5:11-cv-05070-HRL Notice sent by U.S. Mail to:

2

Frances Barragan
2297 Pasetta Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95035

3
4
5

5:11-cv-05070-HRL Courtesy copy sent by U.S. Mail to:

6

Dawnalee Brooking
Dawnalee’s Legal Docs
123 East San Carlos Street No. 331
San Jose, CA 95112

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2