OpenDNS, Inc. v. Paxfire, Inc.
Filing
54
ORDER REFERRING MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Pursuant to Section I(A) of the undersigned's Standing Order for Patent Cases, any disputes regarding any party's Patent Disclosures are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Pl aintiff's Motion to Strike Amended Infringement Contentions 53 must be re-noticed before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. The deadlines and hearing scheduled before District Judge Edward J. Davila are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/12/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05101 EJD
OPENDNS, INC.,
11
ORDER REFERRING MATTER TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
PAXFIRE, INC.,
[Docket Item No(s). 53]
14
Defendant(s).
15
16
/
Pursuant to Section I(A) of the undersigned’s Standing Order for Patent Cases, any disputes
17
regarding any party’s Patent Disclosures are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge.
18
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Amended Infringement Contentions (Docket Item No. 53)
19
must be re-noticed before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. The deadlines and hearing scheduled
20
before District Judge Edward J. Davila are TERMINATED.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: February 12, 2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05101 EJD
ORDER REFERRING MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?