OpenDNS, Inc. v. Paxfire, Inc.

Filing 54

ORDER REFERRING MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Pursuant to Section I(A) of the undersigned's Standing Order for Patent Cases, any disputes regarding any party's Patent Disclosures are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Pl aintiff's Motion to Strike Amended Infringement Contentions 53 must be re-noticed before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. The deadlines and hearing scheduled before District Judge Edward J. Davila are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/12/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05101 EJD OPENDNS, INC., 11 ORDER REFERRING MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. PAXFIRE, INC., [Docket Item No(s). 53] 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 / Pursuant to Section I(A) of the undersigned’s Standing Order for Patent Cases, any disputes 17 regarding any party’s Patent Disclosures are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. 18 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Amended Infringement Contentions (Docket Item No. 53) 19 must be re-noticed before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. The deadlines and hearing scheduled 20 before District Judge Edward J. Davila are TERMINATED. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: February 12, 2013 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05101 EJD ORDER REFERRING MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?