Woburn Retirement System v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 118

STIPULATION AND ORDER 117 Regarding Scheduling Matters. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/22/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE
STEPHEN R. BASSER (121590)
SAMUEL M. WARD (216562)
600 West Broadway, Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

BRANSTETTER, STRANCH
& JENNINGS, PLLC
J. Gerard Stranch, IV
James G. Stranch, III
227 Second Avenue North, Fourth Floor
Nashville, TN 37201-1631
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Oakland County Employees’ Retirement System,
Laborers’ District Council Contractors’ Pension Fund of Ohio, and Woburn Retirement
System and the Proposed Class
[Additional counsel appear on signature page]

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18

In re OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. LITIGATION

19
This Document Relates to:
20

ALL ACTIONS.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [] Order Regarding Scheduling Matters
Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING
MATTERS
Judge: The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

1

STIPULATION

2

WHEREAS, on February 21, 2012, this Court entered an order consolidating related

3

cases, appointing the Institutional Investors Group as lead plaintiff and approving its choice of

4

lead counsel;
WHEREAS, the February 21, 2012 order also established that, unless otherwise agreed

5

by the parties, lead plaintiff would file an amended complaint within sixty (60) days of entry of

6

the February 21, 2012 order, defendants would respond or file any motions directed at the

7

amended complaint within sixty (60) days of the filing of the amended complaint, any

8

opposition thereto would be filed within sixty (60) days of such motion and any reply would be

9

filed within thirty (30) days of such opposition;
WHEREAS, on April 23, 2012, plaintiffs filed the Consolidated Class Action Complaint

10
11

(“Consolidated Complaint”);
WHEREAS, defendants intend to file a motion to dismiss and the parties have met and

12

conferred regarding a possible hearing date for that motion;

13
14

WHEREAS, based on those discussions, the parties have agreed that defendants will
notice the hearing date for October 26, 2012;

15

WHEREAS, in light of the anticipated hearing date, the parties have met and conferred

16

and agreed on extending the briefing schedule for the motion to dismiss by approximately three

17

days as follows:
1.

18

Defendants shall file their responses to the Consolidated Complaint on or before
June 25, 2012.

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25
26
27

///
///
///
///

28

1
Stipulation and [] Order Regarding Scheduling Matters
Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW

1

2.

Any oppositions shall be filed on or before August 24, 2012.

2

3.

Any replies shall be filed on or before September 24, 2012.

3

IT IS SO STIPULATED

4

DATED: June 20, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE
STEPHEN R. BASSER
SAMUEL M. WARD

5
6

/s/ SAMUEL M. WARD
SAMUEL M. WARD

7
8

600 West Broadway, Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10
11

BRANSTETTER, STRANCH
& JENNINGS, PLLC
J. Gerard Stranch, IV
James G. Stranch, III

12
13

/s/ J. GERARD STRANCH, IV____
J. GERARD STRANCH, IV

14
15

227 Second Avenue North, Fourth Floor
Nashville, TN 37201-1631
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16
17

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs
Oakland County Employees’ Retirement
System, Laborers’ District Council
Contractors’ Pension Fund of Ohio, and
Woburn Retirement System and the
Proposed Class

18
19
20
21
22

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
CHRISTOPHER J. KELLER
[e-mail]
JONATHAN GARDNER
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

23
24
25
26
27

Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Woburn

28

2
Stipulation and [] Order Regarding Scheduling Matters
Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW

1

Retirement System

2
3

DATED: June 20, 2012

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH &
ROSATI
Professional Corporation

4

/s/ ANGIE YOUNG KIM
ANGIE YOUNG KIM
Douglas J. Clark
Cynthia A. Dy
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants OmniVision
Technologies, Inc., Shaw Hong, Anson
Chan, and Aurelio “Ray” Cisneros

10
11
12
13
14

I, Samuel M. Ward, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Scheduling Matters. In compliance with General
Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that all signatories have concurred in this filing.

15

/S/ SAMUEL M. WARD
SAMUEL M. WARD

16
17
18

ORDER

19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21

DATED: June __, 2010
The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
Stipulation and [] Order Regarding Scheduling Matters
Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW