Woburn Retirement System v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 125

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 124 Stipulation.(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE
STEPHEN R. BASSER (121590)
[e-mail]
SAMUEL M. WARD (216562)
[e-mail]
600 West Broadway, Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
BRANSTETTER, STRANCH
& JENNINGS, PLLC
J. GERARD STRANCH, IV
[e-mail]
JAMES G. STRANCH, III
[e-mail]
227 Second Avenue N, Fourth Floor
Nashville, TN 37201-1631
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Co- Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs Oakland County Employees' Retirement System,
Laborers' District Council Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio,
and Woburn Retirement System and the Proposed Class.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19

In re OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
LITIGATION

This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [] Order

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW
CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER

1

WHEREAS, Oakland County Employees' Retirement System, Laborers' District Council

2

Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio, and Woburn Retirement System, ("Lead Plaintiffs") filed an

3

Amended Complaint against Omnivision Technologies, Inc., Shaw Hong, Anson Chan, and

4

Aurelio "Ray" Cisneros, ("Defendants") in Case No. 11-cv-05235 on April 23, 2012;

5
6

WHEREAS, on June 25, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended
Complaint;
WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3(a) states that briefs in opposition to a motion "may not

7
8

exceed 25 pages of text";

9

WHEREAS, given the complexity and importance of the issues raised by Defendants'

10

motion to dismiss, Lead Plaintiffs have requested, and Defendants do not object to, 7 additional

11

pages to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss;
WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3(c) states that Defendants' reply brief in support of their

12
13

motion to dismiss "may not exceed 15 pages of text"; and

14

WHEREAS, Defendants have requested, and Lead Plaintiffs do not object to, 4

15

additional pages to reply to Lead Plaintiffs' brief in response to the motion to dismiss.

16

///

17

///

18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1
Stipulation and [] Order —Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW

1

NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their respective counsel of record, the

2

Parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to approval by the Court, that Lead Plaintiffs' brief in

3

response to Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be no longer than 32 pages and Defendants'

4

reply brief thereto shall be no longer than 19 pages.

5
6
7

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: August 16, 2012

BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE
STEPHEN R. BASSER
SAMUEL M. WARD

8
9

/s/ SAMUEL M. WARD
SAMUEL M. WARD

10
11

600 West Broadway, Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: August 16, 2012

BRANSTETTER, STRANCH
& JENNINGS, PLLC
J. Gerard Stranch, IV
James G. Stranch, III
/s/ J. GERARD STRANCH, IV
J. GERARD STRANCH, IV
227 Second Avenue North, Fourth Floor
Nashville, TN 37201-1631
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Oakland
County Employees' Retirement System, Laborers'
District Council Contractors' Pension Fund of
Ohio, and Woburn Retirement System and the
Proposed Class

24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation and [] Order —Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
CHRISTOPHER J. KELLER
[e-mail]
JONATHAN GARDNER
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2
3
4
5
6

Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Woburn Retirement
System

7
8

DATED: August 16, 2012

9

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH &
ROSATI
Professional Corporation
/s/ ANGIE YOUNG KIM
ANGIE YOUNG KIM

10
11

Douglas J. Clark
Cynthia A. Dy
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
13
14
15

Attorneys for Defendants OmniVision
Technologies, Inc., Shaw Hong, Anson
Chan, and Aurelio "Ray" Cisneros

16
17

I, Samuel M. Ward, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

18

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest

19

that all signatories have concurred in this filing.

20

/s/ SAMUEL M. WARD
SAMUEL M. WARD

21
22
23

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26

DATED: August __, 2012

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

27
28
3
Stipulation and [] Order —Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW