Brodzki v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
26
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL. Motions terminated: 24 MOTION for Hearing filed by Anthony Brodzki. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/6/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2012)
1
** E-filed February 6, 2012 **
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
8
United States District Court
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
ANTHONY BRODZKI,
No. C11-05299 HRL
Plaintiff,
12
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
14
15
Defendant.
____________________________________/
16
Plaintiff Anthony Brodzki has filed a pro se complaint against the United States of America
17
claiming that the defendant has harassed and tortured him in unspecified ways, and that it has failed
18
to investigate a rape that occurred some 45 years ago. The defendant moved to dismiss for lack of
19
subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In its order
20
of January 26, 2012, this court granted the defendant’s motion, denied all other pending motions,
21
and dismissed the complaint. See Dkt. No. 23.
22
Accordingly, the complaint having been dismissed, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
23
DECREED THAT judgment of dismissal be entered and that plaintiff take nothing by his complaint.
24
The Clerk shall close the file.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 6, 2012
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
C11-05299 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to:
2
James A. Scharf
3
Notice will be mailed to:
4
5
6
7
james.scharf@usdoj.gov
Anthony Brodzki
6900 Herman Jared Drive
North Richland Hills, TX 76182
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?