Brodzki v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 26

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL. Motions terminated: 24 MOTION for Hearing filed by Anthony Brodzki. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/6/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 ** E-filed February 6, 2012 ** 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California NOT FOR CITATION 8 United States District Court 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 ANTHONY BRODZKI, No. C11-05299 HRL Plaintiff, 12 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL v. 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 15 Defendant. ____________________________________/ 16 Plaintiff Anthony Brodzki has filed a pro se complaint against the United States of America 17 claiming that the defendant has harassed and tortured him in unspecified ways, and that it has failed 18 to investigate a rape that occurred some 45 years ago. The defendant moved to dismiss for lack of 19 subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In its order 20 of January 26, 2012, this court granted the defendant’s motion, denied all other pending motions, 21 and dismissed the complaint. See Dkt. No. 23. 22 Accordingly, the complaint having been dismissed, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 23 DECREED THAT judgment of dismissal be entered and that plaintiff take nothing by his complaint. 24 The Clerk shall close the file. 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2012 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1 C11-05299 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 James A. Scharf 3 Notice will be mailed to: 4 5 6 7 james.scharf@usdoj.gov Anthony Brodzki 6900 Herman Jared Drive North Richland Hills, TX 76182 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?