Pacific Reality Investment Group, Inc v. Sprangler et al

Filing 13

AMENDED ORDER by Judge Edward J. Davila Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal. This order terminates 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; 7 Motion to Remand; 8 Motion to Shorten Time. The court o rders this action REMANDED to the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara. Upon remand, the Clerk of the Court shall close this file. (ejdlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/2/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:CV 11-05303-EJD PACIFIC REALITY INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 Plaintiff(s), v. 13 [Re: Docket Item Nos. 3, 7, 8, 10] RUSSELL S. SPRANGLER, ET AL., 14 15 Defendant(s). / 16 17 No objections having been received within the time allowed by Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 72(b), the court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) 19 issued by Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal on November 16, 2011. See Docket Item No. 10. 20 Accordingly, the court orders this action REMANDED to the Superior Court of California 21 for the County of Santa Clara. This order terminates Docket Item Nos. 3, 7, and 8. Upon remand, 22 the Clerk of the Court shall close this file. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: December 2, 2011 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:CV-11-5303 EJD (PSG) AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (EJDLC4) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 CASE NO. 5:CV-11-5303 EJD (PSG) AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (EJDLC4)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?