Pacific Reality Investment Group, Inc v. Sprangler et al
Filing
13
AMENDED ORDER by Judge Edward J. Davila Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal. This order terminates 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; 7 Motion to Remand; 8 Motion to Shorten Time. The court o rders this action REMANDED to the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara. Upon remand, the Clerk of the Court shall close this file. (ejdlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/2/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:CV 11-05303-EJD
PACIFIC REALITY INVESTMENT
GROUP, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
12
Plaintiff(s),
v.
13
[Re: Docket Item Nos. 3, 7, 8, 10]
RUSSELL S. SPRANGLER, ET AL.,
14
15
Defendant(s).
/
16
17
No objections having been received within the time allowed by Federal Rule of Civil
18
Procedure 72(b), the court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (“Recommendation”)
19
issued by Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal on November 16, 2011. See Docket Item No. 10.
20
Accordingly, the court orders this action REMANDED to the Superior Court of California
21
for the County of Santa Clara. This order terminates Docket Item Nos. 3, 7, and 8. Upon remand,
22
the Clerk of the Court shall close this file.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: December 2, 2011
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:CV-11-5303 EJD (PSG)
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (EJDLC4)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 5:CV-11-5303 EJD (PSG)
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (EJDLC4)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?