Kremen v. Cohen et al

Filing 162

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 160 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply in Support of 156 MOTION for Summary Judgment.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

GARY KREMEN,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL JOSEPH COHEN, an individual; and )
FNBPAY CORPORATION, an Arizona
)
corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 5:11-CV-05411-LHK
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17

Plaintiff Gary Kremen filed this action on November 8, 2011, against Defendants Michael

18

Joseph Cohen and FNBPay Corporation (collectively “Defendants”), upon information and belief

19

that Defendants are the transferees of certain property, including money, fraudulently transferred to

20

each of them by Stephen Michael Cohen, an individual against whom Plaintiff has an enforceable

21

and unpaid money judgment in the amount of $67,867,053.36. See ECF No. 1. On October 15,

22

2012, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 156. On October 29, 2012,

23

Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 158.

24

Defendants’ reply was due on November 6, 2012. See Civil Local Rule 7–3. However, on

25

November 7, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to extend time to file the reply and declarations in

26

support of the reply, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6–3. ECF No. 160.

27
28

1
Case No.: 5:11-CV-05411-LHK
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

The Court, having considered Defendants’ motion and the exhibits filed in support thereof,

2

finds good cause to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their reply. Accordingly, the Court

3

hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion. Defendants shall have until November 13, 2012, to file

4

with the Court their reply and supporting declarations in support of the motion for summary

5

judgment.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

Dated: November 9, 2012

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 5:11-CV-05411-LHK
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT