Kremen v. Cohen et al
Filing
75
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying 74 Ex Parte Motion to Shorten Time.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
GARY KREMEN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL JOSEPH COHEN, an individual; and )
FNBPAY CORPORATION, an Arizona
)
corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 5:11-cv-05411-LHK
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
MICHAEL J. COHEN’S EX PARTE
MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(re: dkt # 74)
On February 6, 2012, Defendant Michael J. Cohen (“Defendant”) filed both a motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 72) and an ex parte motion to shorten time for hearing on his motion
for summary judgment (ECF No. 74). Defendant’s ex parte motion to shorten time fails to comply
with Civil Local Rule 7-10. Moreover, Defendant’s ex parte motion fails to: (1) set forth with
particularity the reasons for the requested shortening of time; (2) describe Defendant’s efforts to
obtain a stipulation to the time change; and (3) identify the substantial harm or prejudice that would
occur absent a shortening of time, as required by Civil Local Rule 6-3. No good cause having been
shown, Defendant’s ex parte motion to shorten time for hearing on his summary judgment motion
is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
1
Case No.: 11-cv-05411-LHK
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
1
2
3
Dated: February 16, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-cv-05411-LHK
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?