Kremen v. Cohen et al

Filing 75

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying 74 Ex Parte Motion to Shorten Time.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 GARY KREMEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL JOSEPH COHEN, an individual; and ) FNBPAY CORPORATION, an Arizona ) corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 5:11-cv-05411-LHK ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. COHEN’S EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (re: dkt # 74) On February 6, 2012, Defendant Michael J. Cohen (“Defendant”) filed both a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 72) and an ex parte motion to shorten time for hearing on his motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 74). Defendant’s ex parte motion to shorten time fails to comply with Civil Local Rule 7-10. Moreover, Defendant’s ex parte motion fails to: (1) set forth with particularity the reasons for the requested shortening of time; (2) describe Defendant’s efforts to obtain a stipulation to the time change; and (3) identify the substantial harm or prejudice that would occur absent a shortening of time, as required by Civil Local Rule 6-3. No good cause having been shown, Defendant’s ex parte motion to shorten time for hearing on his summary judgment motion is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 1 Case No.: 11-cv-05411-LHK ORDER DENYING EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME 1 2 3 Dated: February 16, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 11-cv-05411-LHK ORDER DENYING EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?