Kremen v. Cohen et al
Filing
8
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/2/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)
1
2
*E-FILED 12-02-2011*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
No. C11-05411 HRL
GARY KREMEN,
12
ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED
TO A DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
15
MICHAEL JOSEPH COHEN and FNBPAY
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
/
16
17
Plaintiff has filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order. (Docket No.
18
5). Because plaintiff requests immediate injunctive relief, but none of the parties have
19
consented to magistrate jurisdiction, the undersigned lacks jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s
20
application. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the Court shall promptly to
21
reassign this case to a district judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636.
22
23
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 2, 2011
24
HOWARD R. LLOYD
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:11-cv-05411-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Timothy Patrick Dillon
3
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
tdillon@dillongerardi.com, mmelton@dillongerardi.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?