A10 Networks Inc v. Brocade Communications Systems Inc et al
Filing
51
ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 1/25/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/1/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/19/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2011)
______________________________________
1
4
6
7
8
9
10
FAI3I() f’IAR1N() (SlATF lIAR Nt). I 83825)
liiarinou orrick.c oin
1)1 NISI MIN(JRONI (SI All 13 \R NO I 3224)
dmingroneiorrick.corn
SIDDI-IAR lilA \ ENKA I F SAN (S IA 11 BAR NO 24008)
svenkatesan@orrick. corn
CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE 13AR NO, 255467)
cvonderahe(orrick.corn
NITIN GAMBHIR (STA I F BAR NO 259906)
ngarnbhi r@orrick.com
ORRI( K IIERRINGTON & SUTCLIFl[ II P
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park. California 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys lbr DeIIndani
BRO( AI)I C OMMI JNI( A I IONS SYS I LMS INC
UNFIED SIAHS DISTRICI COURT
11
NORTHERN DIS IRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
AlO NETWORKS, INC.. a I)elaware
corporation.
I
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation.
Defendant.
19
Case No.: I 1-cv-05493 LHK
STIPULATION AND IPROPOSEDI
ORI)ER RESETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO
FEBRUARY 1,2012 AT 2 PM
Dept:
Courtroom 8. 4th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, 1{ERRI\GTC
SUTcT 5FF II.P
S..
&
-,
-
-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASENO. I I-Cv-05493 LFIK
1
Plaintiff AlO Networks, Inc. and I)efendant Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
2
jointly stipulate and request that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled in the
3
above—entitled action br .hmuarv I 1 20]
4
jointly request this date change and ask that the Court approve it based on unavoidable schedule
5
conflicts lead counsel both have on January 11, 2012. In addition, the parties have jointly.agreed
6
to an extension of time by which Brocade must answer or otherwise respond to A 10’s complaint.
7
That stipulation may lead either to resolution of this matter or the filing ofan amended complaint.
8
the occurrence of which would benefit by a later-scheduled ease management conference. As a
9
result. the parties respectililly request that the Court approve their stipulation and reset the Case
10
11
12
be reset to February 1 2012 at 2 p.m. The parties
Management Conference to February 1. 2012 at 2 p.m.
Dated: December 6, 2011
13
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
/s/ Fabio Alarino
FABIO MARINO
Attorneys for T)efendant
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
14
15
16
2
Dated: December 6. 2011
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
17
/c/_Mark A. F/age!
MARK A. FLAGEL
Attorneys for PlaintiffAlO NETWORKS. INC
18
19
20
ATTESTATION
21
1, Denise A/I. Mingrone, am the ECF User whose identifIcation and password are being
22
used to/lie this Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Resetting Case Management Conference To
23
February 1, 2012 At 2 P. Al. Pursuant
24
counsei/1r Piainiijj has concurred in this filing.
25
28
&
Order 45.XB., I hereby attest that Mark F/age!,
/s/ Demse M.Mingrone
DENISE M. M1NGRONE
Attorneys for Defendant
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC.
77
ORRICK,HERRINGTON
to General
OHSWEST:261413 158.1
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RLS[T INO C”SF MAN AGFMEN F CO\FELI NCF
CASE NO. 1 I-cv-05493 111K
_
_____
____
Case5:11-cv-05493-LHK Document45
I
______
_______
CASE
_____
____
Filed12/06/11 Page3 of 3
The Court grants the parties’ request and hereby resets the Case Management
Conference
2
in this matter to February 1, 2012 at 2 p.m. Counsel shall file a Joint Case Management
S
Con ference Statement on or before .January 25, 2012.
4
6
IT IS SO ORI)ERED.
Dated: December 19
2011
1-lonorable Lucy ii. Koh
United States I)istrict Court Judge
7
0
0
9
10
11
12
Ii
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
-y)
24
25
26
27
28
RK\
ii
&
OHSWEST:261413 158.
-
STIPULATION ANI) [PROPOSED] ORDER
RESLTTINCiCASFMAN\OFMEN1 CONFERI NC[
NO. 11-cv-05493 LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?