A10 Networks Inc v. Brocade Communications Systems Inc et al

Filing 51

ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 1/25/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/1/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/19/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2011)

Download PDF
______________________________________ 1 4 6 7 8 9 10 FAI3I() f’IAR1N() (SlATF lIAR Nt). I 83825) liiarinou orrick.c oin 1)1 NISI MIN(JRONI (SI All 13 \R NO I 3224) dmingroneiorrick.corn SIDDI-IAR lilA \ ENKA I F SAN (S IA 11 BAR NO 24008) svenkatesan@orrick. corn CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE 13AR NO, 255467) cvonderahe(orrick.corn NITIN GAMBHIR (STA I F BAR NO 259906) ngarnbhi r@orrick.com ORRI( K IIERRINGTON & SUTCLIFl[ II P 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park. California 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Attorneys lbr DeIIndani BRO( AI)I C OMMI JNI( A I IONS SYS I LMS INC UNFIED SIAHS DISTRICI COURT 11 NORTHERN DIS IRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 14 SAN JOSE DIVISION AlO NETWORKS, INC.. a I)elaware corporation. I Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 18 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation. Defendant. 19 Case No.: I 1-cv-05493 LHK STIPULATION AND IPROPOSEDI ORI)ER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO FEBRUARY 1,2012 AT 2 PM Dept: Courtroom 8. 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, 1{ERRI\GTC SUTcT 5FF II.P S.. & -, - - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASENO. I I-Cv-05493 LFIK 1 Plaintiff AlO Networks, Inc. and I)efendant Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 2 jointly stipulate and request that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled in the 3 above—entitled action br .hmuarv I 1 20] 4 jointly request this date change and ask that the Court approve it based on unavoidable schedule 5 conflicts lead counsel both have on January 11, 2012. In addition, the parties have jointly.agreed 6 to an extension of time by which Brocade must answer or otherwise respond to A 10’s complaint. 7 That stipulation may lead either to resolution of this matter or the filing ofan amended complaint. 8 the occurrence of which would benefit by a later-scheduled ease management conference. As a 9 result. the parties respectililly request that the Court approve their stipulation and reset the Case 10 11 12 be reset to February 1 2012 at 2 p.m. The parties Management Conference to February 1. 2012 at 2 p.m. Dated: December 6, 2011 13 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP /s/ Fabio Alarino FABIO MARINO Attorneys for T)efendant BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. 14 15 16 2 Dated: December 6. 2011 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 17 /c/_Mark A. F/age! MARK A. FLAGEL Attorneys for PlaintiffAlO NETWORKS. INC 18 19 20 ATTESTATION 21 1, Denise A/I. Mingrone, am the ECF User whose identifIcation and password are being 22 used to/lie this Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Resetting Case Management Conference To 23 February 1, 2012 At 2 P. Al. Pursuant 24 counsei/1r Piainiijj has concurred in this filing. 25 28 & Order 45.XB., I hereby attest that Mark F/age!, /s/ Demse M.Mingrone DENISE M. M1NGRONE Attorneys for Defendant BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. 77 ORRICK,HERRINGTON to General OHSWEST:261413 158.1 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RLS[T INO C”SF MAN AGFMEN F CO\FELI NCF CASE NO. 1 I-cv-05493 111K _ _____ ____ Case5:11-cv-05493-LHK Document45 I ______ _______ CASE _____ ____ Filed12/06/11 Page3 of 3 The Court grants the parties’ request and hereby resets the Case Management Conference 2 in this matter to February 1, 2012 at 2 p.m. Counsel shall file a Joint Case Management S Con ference Statement on or before .January 25, 2012. 4 6 IT IS SO ORI)ERED. Dated: December 19 2011 1-lonorable Lucy ii. Koh United States I)istrict Court Judge 7 0 0 9 10 11 12 Ii 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 -y) 24 25 26 27 28 RK\ ii & OHSWEST:261413 158. - STIPULATION ANI) [PROPOSED] ORDER RESLTTINCiCASFMAN\OFMEN1 CONFERI NC[ NO. 11-cv-05493 LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?