A10 Networks Inc v. Brocade Communications Systems Inc et al

Filing 88

Judgment Dismissing Action in Favor of Defendant and Against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/27/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2012)

Case5:11-cv-05493-LHK Document87 Filed06/27/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4

FABIO E. MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
[e-mail]
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
650-815-7400
Facsimile:
650-815-7401

5
6
7
8
9
10

DENISE M. MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Defendant
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN JOSE DIVISION

14
15
16

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation,

17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiff,
v.
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Case No. 5:11-cv-05493-LHK
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
DISMISSING ACTION IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANT AND AGAINST
PLAINTIFF
Ctrm:
Judge:

8, 4th Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh

Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S ILICON VALLEY

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05493-LHK

Case5:11-cv-05493-LHK Document87 Filed06/27/12 Page2 of 2

1

On May 29, 2012, the Court issued an order granting Defendant Brocade Communications

2

Systems Inc.’s (“Brocade”) motion to dismiss on the grounds that Plaintiff A10 Neworks, Inc.

3

(“A10”) lacks standing to assert the claim alleged in A10’s First Amended Complaint and for

4

A10’s failure to join necessary and indispensable parties. D.I. 081. The Court granted A10

5

twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint to add parties. The 21 days has elapsed and

6

A10 has failed to file an amended complaint. As a result, the Court hereby dismisses this case

7

and enters judgment in favor of Brocade and against A10 in the above-entitled action. Each party

8

to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk shall close the file.

9
10

27
Dated: June ____, 2012

_______________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S ILICON VALLEY

-1-

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05493-LHK