FSM Development Bank v. Arthur et al

Filing 14

ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/6/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED 12-06-2011* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 No. C11-05494 HRL FSM DEVELOPMENT BANK a/k/a FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA DEVELOPMENT BANK, 13 ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, v. 14 ROBERT ARTHUR and PATRICIA ARTHUR, 15 Defendants. 16 17 / AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS / 18 19 Plaintiff moves to dismiss the cross-complaint, and defendants move for an order 20 remanding this action to state court. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73-1, no later than December 21 5, 2011, each party was to have filed either a consent or declination to proceed before a United 22 States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not yet done so, despite a reminder from the court. 23 (See Dkt. No. 9). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the Court shall reassign 24 this case to a District Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. All motion hearings noticed before the 25 undersigned are vacated. 26 27 SO ORDERED. Dated: December 6, 2011 HOWARD R. LLOYD 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:11-cv-05494-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Carol Anne Jasinski 3 Edward Mevi 4 Kathryn S. Diemer 5 Michael Alex Mazzocone 6 Robert Charles Diemer 7 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. cjasinski@cholakian.net edwardmevi@gmail.com kdiemer@diemerwhitman.com michael@mazzlaw.com rdiemer@dblawsf.com 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?