FSM Development Bank v. Arthur et al
Filing
14
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/6/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)
1
2
*E-FILED 12-06-2011*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
No. C11-05494 HRL
FSM DEVELOPMENT BANK a/k/a
FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
DEVELOPMENT BANK,
13
ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED
TO A DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff,
v.
14
ROBERT ARTHUR and PATRICIA ARTHUR,
15
Defendants.
16
17
/
AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS
/
18
19
Plaintiff moves to dismiss the cross-complaint, and defendants move for an order
20
remanding this action to state court. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73-1, no later than December
21
5, 2011, each party was to have filed either a consent or declination to proceed before a United
22
States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not yet done so, despite a reminder from the court.
23
(See Dkt. No. 9). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the Court shall reassign
24
this case to a District Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. All motion hearings noticed before the
25
undersigned are vacated.
26
27
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 6, 2011
HOWARD R. LLOYD
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:11-cv-05494-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Carol Anne Jasinski
3
Edward Mevi
4
Kathryn S. Diemer
5
Michael Alex Mazzocone
6
Robert Charles Diemer
7
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
cjasinski@cholakian.net
edwardmevi@gmail.com
kdiemer@diemerwhitman.com
michael@mazzlaw.com
rdiemer@dblawsf.com
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?