Cunningham v. Grounds

Filing 2

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/11/12. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

JOHN EDWARD CUNNINGHAM, JR.,

13

Petitioner,

14

v.

15

WARDEN R. GROUNDS,

16

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 11-5576 LHK (PR)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. The Court orders Respondent to
19
show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.
20
DISCUSSION
21
A.

Standard of Review

22
This Court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in
23
custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court only on the ground that he is in custody in
24
violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Rose
25
v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975).
26
A district court shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show
27
cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the
28
Order to Show Cause
P:\pro-se\sj.lhk\hc.11\Cunningham576osc

1

applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” 28 U.S.C. § 2243.

2

B.

3

Petitioner’s Claims
In 2003, Petitioner was sentenced to a term of 16 years after being convicted of one count

4

of continuous sexual abuse. He alleges that (1) the trial court committed prejudicial error when

5

it permitted the prosecution to introduce unreliable hearsay statements, and (2) the trial court

6

violated his right to a jury trial when it improperly imposed the upper-term sentence based on its

7

own fact-finding. Liberally construed, Plaintiff states cognizable claims for relief.

8
9

CONCLUSION
1.

The Clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this order and the petition (docket no. 1)

10

and all attachments thereto upon the Respondent and the Respondent’s attorney, the Attorney

11

General of the State of California. The Clerk shall also serve a copy of this order on Petitioner.

12

2.

Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner, within ninety days

13

of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules

14

Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be

15

granted. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve on Petitioner a copy of all portions of

16

the underlying state criminal record that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to

17

a determination of the issues presented by the petition.

18
19
20

If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the
Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty days of the date the answer is filed.
4.

Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an

21

answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section

22

2254 Cases within ninety days of the date this order is filed. If Respondent files such a motion,

23

Petitioner shall file with the court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-

24

opposition within thirty days of the date the motion is filed, and Respondent shall file with the

25

court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen days of the date any opposition is filed.

26

5.

It is Petitioner’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner is reminded that

27

all communications with the Court must be served on Respondent by mailing a true copy of the

28

document to Respondent’s counsel. Petitioner must keep the court and all parties informed of
Order to Show Cause
P:\pro-se\sj.lhk\hc.11\Cunningham576osc

2

1

any change of address by filing a separate paper captioned “Notice of Change of Address.” He

2

must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the

3

dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

4

41(b).

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
1/11/12
DATED:

6

LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order to Show Cause
P:\pro-se\sj.lhk\hc.11\Cunningham576osc

3