Johnson v. Sky Chefs, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER re 11 Stipulation, filed by Saundra Johnson. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/12/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2011)

Download PDF
3 Alan Harris (SBN 146079) HARRIS & RUBLE 6424 Santa Monica Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90038 Tel: 323.962.3777 Fax: 323.962.3004 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 8 Rebecca M. Aragon (SBN 134496) Littler Mendelson 2049 Century Park East, Ste. 500 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3107 Tel: 310.553.0308 Fax: 310.553.5583 9 Attorneys for Defendant 1 2 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 14 15 SAUNDRA JOHNSON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 v. SKY CHEFS, INC., a Delaware business entity, and DOE ONE through and including DOE ONE HUNDRED, Case No: CV11-05619 LHK Assigned to Hon. Lucy H. Koh STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO SKY CHEFS, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SKY CHEFS, INC.’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIP.TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINES FOR PL.’S OPP. TO DEF.’S MTN. TO DISMISS AND DEF.’S REPLY Plaintiff Saundra Johnson ("Plaintiff') and Defendant Sky Chefs, Inc. 1 2 ("Defendant") (Plaintiff and Defendant collectively referred to as "the Parties"), by and 3 through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: STIPULATION 4 WHEREAS, on or about October 18, 2011, Plaintiff commenced a civil action in 5 6 Santa Clara Superior Court on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, entitled 7 Saundra Johnson v. Sky Chefs, Inc., bearing Case No. 111 CV211330; WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the Complaint on or about October 20, 8 9 2011, and the First Amended Complaint ("FAC") on November 15, 2011; 10 11 WHEREAS, Defendant removed the state action to the above-captioned court on November21,2011; 12 WHEREAS, Defendant filed a FRCP 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the FAC (the 13 "Motion") on November 28, 2011, which is scheduled to be heard on March 8, 2012; WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a),the deadline for Plaintiff to file an 14 15 Oppositon to Defendant's Motion is December 12, 2011; 16 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(c), the deadline for Defendant to file 17 a Reply in Support of its FRCP 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the FAC is December 19, 18 2011; 19 WHEREAS, as described in the accompanying Declaration of Alan Harris, the 20 parties have met and conferred regarding Defendant's Motion and desire to continue the 21 Opposition and Reply deadlines so that the Parties can engage in good faith settlement 22 negotiations in an effort to resolve this matter expeditiously and without further 23 unwarranted expense; 24 25 Therefore, the Parties stipulate and agree that: 1. 26 27 Plaintiff will file and serve any Opposition to the Motion, supporting memoranda and documents on or before January 9, 2011; 2. Defendant will file and serve any Reply in support of the Motion, 28 2 STIP.TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINES FOR PL.'S OPP. TO DEF.'S MTN. TO DISMISS AND DEF.'S REPLY 1 supporting memoranda and documents on or before February 15, 2 2011. 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 DATED: December 7, 2011 Is/_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 5 Alan Harris Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 HARRIS & RUBLE r DATED: Decemberf, 2011 9 10 11 12 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 DATED: December 12, 2011 16 HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIP.TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINES FOR PL.'S OPP. TO DEF. 'S MTN. TO DISMISS AND DEF. 'S REPLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?