Reddy v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 294

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal denying 270 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KRISHNA REDDY, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 Case No. 5:11-cv-05632-PSG ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT (Re: Docket No. 270) 10 NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Krishna Reddy moves to reopen judgment under Rules 59(e) and 60(b).1 Reddy 13 14 argues that the undersigned lacked jurisdiction over the case after she filed her 28 U.S.C. § 144 15 affidavit for his disqualification,2 and so all of the court’s prior rulings, orders, and judgments 16 should be vacated, the case should be reassigned, judgment should be entered against all 17 Defendants, and Defendants should be ordered to post a bond for the amount of judgment and 18 Reddy’s costs.3 Reddy’s motion raises no new arguments but merely repeats the same arguments raised in 19 20 her previous requests for the recusal of the undersigned and the postponement of her trial.4 21 Reddy’s arguments did not pass “Go” on their first airing,5 and they fare no better on repetition. 22 1 See Docket No. 270. 2 See Docket No. 261. 3 See Docket No. 270 at 4-10. 4 Compare Docket No. 270 with Docket Nos. 152, 193, 261, 264. 5 See Docket Nos. 165, 222, 263, 268. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:11-cv-05632-PSG ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT 1 For the reasons stated in the court’s prior orders,6 Reddy’s motion is DENIED. 2 SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: November 9, 2015 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 See Docket No. 263 at 3-4; Docket No. 268. 2 Case No. 5:11-cv-05632-PSG ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?