Reddy v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al
Filing
294
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal denying 270 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KRISHNA REDDY,
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
Case No. 5:11-cv-05632-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
ALTER JUDGMENT
(Re: Docket No. 270)
10
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et
al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
Plaintiff Krishna Reddy moves to reopen judgment under Rules 59(e) and 60(b).1 Reddy
13
14
argues that the undersigned lacked jurisdiction over the case after she filed her 28 U.S.C. § 144
15
affidavit for his disqualification,2 and so all of the court’s prior rulings, orders, and judgments
16
should be vacated, the case should be reassigned, judgment should be entered against all
17
Defendants, and Defendants should be ordered to post a bond for the amount of judgment and
18
Reddy’s costs.3
Reddy’s motion raises no new arguments but merely repeats the same arguments raised in
19
20
her previous requests for the recusal of the undersigned and the postponement of her trial.4
21
Reddy’s arguments did not pass “Go” on their first airing,5 and they fare no better on repetition.
22
1
See Docket No. 270.
2
See Docket No. 261.
3
See Docket No. 270 at 4-10.
4
Compare Docket No. 270 with Docket Nos. 152, 193, 261, 264.
5
See Docket Nos. 165, 222, 263, 268.
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 5:11-cv-05632-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT
1
For the reasons stated in the court’s prior orders,6 Reddy’s motion is DENIED.
2
SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: November 9, 2015
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
See Docket No. 263 at 3-4; Docket No. 268.
2
Case No. 5:11-cv-05632-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?