Dorsey v. Miller et al
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 6 Motion to Award Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WARDEN W. MILLER,
No. C 11-5798 RMW (PR)
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
AWARD WRIT OF HABEAS
(Docket No. 6)
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Docket No. 1.) On March 8, 2012, the court issued an order to
show cause directing respondent to answer the petition within ninety days. (Docket No. 4.) On
July 2, 2012, respondent filed an application for extension of time to file an answer. (Docket No.
7.) The court found good cause to grant the motion based on the court’s failure to timely mail
out the order to show cause. (Docket No. 9.) Petitioner has filed a motion to award his writ of
habeas corpus on the basis that respondent had not timely complied with the court’s order to
show cause. (See Docket No. 6.) Petitioner’s motion is DENIED as moot.
This order terminates docket no. 6.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
Order Denying Motion to Award W rit of Habeas Corpus
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AMINAH S R DORSEY,
Case Number: CV11-05798 RMW
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
WARDEN et al,
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on December 3, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Aminah Dorsey X34913
PO Box 1508
Chowchilla, CA 93610
Dated: December 3, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?