Thomas, et al v. Carrier IQ Inc, et al

Filing 23

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 22 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865) rcole@fenwick.com MOLLY R. MELCHER (CSB No. 272950) mmelcher@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: 650.988.8500 Facsimile: 650.938.5200 6 7 8 9 10 TYLER G. NEWBY (CSB No. 205790) tnewby@fenwick.com JENNIFER J. JOHNSON (CSB No. 252897) jjjohnson@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 Attorneys for DEFENDANT CARRIER IQ, INC. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 19 ERIC THOMAS, a Texas resident, and BENJAMIN LANCASTER, a Pennsylvania resident, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 20 23 24 25 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE Plaintiffs, 21 22 Case No.: 11-cv-05819-LHK v. CARRIER IQ, a Delaware corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean company; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, Inc. a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 26 Defendants. 27 28 ORDER Case No.: 11-cv-5819-LHK The parties agreed to the following stipulation at ECF No. 22: 1 2 “NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Carrier IQ, and Samsung, by and through their 3 respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 4 The dates currently set for ADR certification and selection, currently set for February 7, 5 2012, and initial disclosures and the filing of Rule 26(f) reports, currently set for February 21, 6 2012, are stayed until further order from this Court, or as otherwise ordered by the MDL 7 transferee court if the MDL Motion is granted, provided, however, that in the event that Carrier 8 IQ or Samsung are ordered or should agree to make initial disclosures in any of the CIQ cases 9 sooner, then Carrier IQ or Samsung, whichever of these two defendants agreed to make initial 10 disclosures, or both Carrier IQ and Samsung, in the event that both agree to make initial 11 disclosures, will make initial disclosures to the plaintiffs in this case in the same format and on MOUNTAIN VIEW the same date as they first make initial disclosures to plaintiffs in any of the other CIQ cases. ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Carrier IQ or Samsung of any defense, 14 including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter 15 jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of process, or service of process.” 16 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: February 9, 2012 Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER 1 Case No.: 11-cv-5819-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?