Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.

Filing 308

ORDER RE 300 4/9/2013 HEARING. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 4, 2013. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS INC., A California corporation, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) SYNOPSYS INC., a Delaware corporation, and ) DOES 1-50 ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 11-CV-05973 PSG ORDER RE 4/9/2013 HEARING (Re: Docket No. 300) Synopsys shall give notice of the 4/9/2013 hearing to third parties Intel and Nvidia without delay. Intel and Nvidia may appear at the hearing if they so wish. Nvidia further may file a 19 response to the pending motion directed toward it no later than 4/5/2013 midnight. By that same 20 21 date, Synopsys and Dynetix may file oppositions to Dynetix’s Fourth Motion to Compel and 22 Synopsys’ Motion for Protective Order, respectively. No further briefs will be considered. All 23 parties should be prepared to discuss all pending motions affecting them and noticed for hearing on 24 4/9/2013 so that the court may resolve each such motion from the bench. 25 26 All parties are directed to meet and confer again on each such motion before the 4/9/2013 hearing, bearing in mind that the court will not hesitate to award fees and costs in resolving the 27 motions that remain. 28 1 Case No.: 11-CV-05973 PSG ORDER RE 4/9/2013 HEARING 1 Time has come to bring order to this unwieldly docket. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: April 4, 2013 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 11-CV-05973 PSG ORDER RE 4/9/2013 HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?