Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.
Filing
308
ORDER RE 300 4/9/2013 HEARING. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 4, 2013. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS INC., A
California corporation,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
)
SYNOPSYS INC., a Delaware corporation, and )
DOES 1-50
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-05973 PSG
ORDER RE 4/9/2013 HEARING
(Re: Docket No. 300)
Synopsys shall give notice of the 4/9/2013 hearing to third parties Intel and Nvidia without
delay. Intel and Nvidia may appear at the hearing if they so wish. Nvidia further may file a
19
response to the pending motion directed toward it no later than 4/5/2013 midnight. By that same
20
21
date, Synopsys and Dynetix may file oppositions to Dynetix’s Fourth Motion to Compel and
22
Synopsys’ Motion for Protective Order, respectively. No further briefs will be considered. All
23
parties should be prepared to discuss all pending motions affecting them and noticed for hearing on
24
4/9/2013 so that the court may resolve each such motion from the bench.
25
26
All parties are directed to meet and confer again on each such motion before the 4/9/2013
hearing, bearing in mind that the court will not hesitate to award fees and costs in resolving the
27
motions that remain.
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-05973 PSG
ORDER RE 4/9/2013 HEARING
1
Time has come to bring order to this unwieldly docket.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: April 4, 2013
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-05973 PSG
ORDER RE 4/9/2013 HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?