Olivares et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 6 (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/9/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)
Case5:11-cv-06151-HRL Document6 Filed12/21/11 Page1 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BRIAN R. STRANGE (SBN 103252)
LACounsel@earthlink.net
STRANGE & CARPENTER
12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Telephone:
(310) 207-5055
Facsimile:
(310) 826-3210
JOSEPH H. MALLEY
(pro hac vice pending)
malleylaw@gmail.com
LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH MALLEY
1045 North Zang Boulevard
Dallas, TX 75208
Telephone: (214) 943-6100
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
12
13
HENRY WEISSMANN (SBN 132418)
Henry.Weissmann@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue
Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone:
(213) 683-9100
Facsimile:
(213) 687-3702
ROSEMARIE T. RING (SBN 220769)
Rose.Ring@mto.com
JONATHAN H. BLAVIN (SBN 230269)
Jonathan.Blavin@mto.com
VICTORIA L. BOESCH (SBN 228561)
Victoria.Boesch@mto.com
BRYAN H. HECKENLIVELY (SBN 279140)
Bryan.Heckenlively@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street
Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2907
Telephone:
(415) 512-4000
Facsimile:
(415) 512-4007
Attorneys for Defendant
HTC America, Inc.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN JOSE DIVISION
18
19
20
ISRAEL OLIVARES; CLARISSA
PORTALES; individuals, on behalf of
themselves and others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
21
22
v.
23
CARRIER IQ, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; HTC AMERICA, INC., a
Washington Corporation,
24
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-06151 HRL
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(MODIFIED BY THE COURT)
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
16027907.1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-06151 HRL
Case5:11-cv-06151-HRL Document6 Filed12/21/11 Page2 of 6
1
WHEREAS the above-referenced plaintiffs filed the above-captioned case;
2
WHEREAS the above-referenced plaintiffs allege violations of the Federal
3
Wiretap Act and other laws by the defendants in this case;
4
WHEREAS over 50 other complaints have been filed to-date in federal district
5
courts throughout the United States by plaintiffs purporting to bring class actions on behalf of
6
cellular telephone and other device users on whose devices software made by defendant Carrier
7
IQ, Inc. is or has been embedded (collectively, including the above-captioned matter, the “CIQ
8
cases”);
9
WHEREAS, a motion is pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
10
Litigation to transfer the CIQ cases to this jurisdiction for coordinated and consolidated pretrial
11
proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407, responses to the motion supporting coordination or
12
consolidation have been filed, and plaintiffs and defendants anticipate that additional responses
13
will be filed;
14
15
16
WHEREAS plaintiffs anticipate the possibility of one or more consolidated
amended complaints in the CIQ cases;
WHEREAS plaintiffs and defendant HTC America, Inc. have agreed that an
17
orderly schedule for any response to the pleadings in the CIQ cases would be more efficient for
18
the parties and for the Court;
19
WHEREAS plaintiffs agree that the deadline for defendant HTC America, Inc. to
20
answer, move, or otherwise respond to their complaint shall be extended until the earliest of the
21
following dates: (1) forty-five days after the filing of a consolidated amended complaint in the
22
CIQ cases; or (2) forty-five days after plaintiffs provide written notice to defendants that plaintiffs
23
do not intend to file a consolidated amended complaint; or (3) as otherwise ordered by this Court
24
or the MDL transferee court; provided, however, that in the event that HTC America, Inc. should
25
agree to an earlier response date in any of these cases, HTC America, Inc. will respond to the
26
complaint in the above-captioned action on that earlier date;
27
WHEREAS plaintiffs further agree that this extension is available, without further
and the court
stipulation with counsel for plaintiffs, to all named defendants who notify plaintiffs in writing of
28
-2-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-06151 HRL
Case5:11-cv-06151-HRL Document6 Filed12/21/11 Page3 of 6
1
2
their intention to join this Stipulation;
WHEREAS this Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by HTC America, Inc. of
3
any defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, subject
4
matter jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of process or service of process;
5
WHEREAS, with respect to any defendant joining the Stipulation, this Stipulation
6
does not constitute a waiver of any defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of
7
personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of process, or
8
service of process; and
9
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and defendant HTC America, Inc., as well as any defendant
10
joining this Stipulation, agree that preservation of evidence in the CIQ cases is vital, that
11
defendants have received litigation hold letters, that they are complying with and will continue to
12
comply with all of their evidence preservation obligations under governing law, and that that the
13
delay brought about by this Stipulation should not result in the loss of any evidence,
14
Now, therefore, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, plaintiffs in the above-
15
referenced case and defendant HTC America, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of
16
record, hereby stipulate as follows:
17
1. The deadline for HTC America, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to
18
plaintiffs’ complaint shall be extended until the earliest of the following dates:
19
forty-five days after the filing of a consolidated amended complaint in these cases;
20
or forty-five days after plaintiffs provide written notice to defendant HTC
21
America, Inc. that plaintiffs do not intend to file a Consolidated Amended
22
Complaint; or as otherwise ordered by this Court or the MDL transferee court;
23
provided, however, that in the event that HTC America, Inc. should agree to an
24
earlier response date in any of these cases, except by court order, HTC America,
25
Inc. will respond to the complaint in the above-captioned case on that earlier date.
26
2. This extension is available, without further stipulation with counsel for plaintiffs,
27
to all named defendants who notify plaintiffs in writing of their intention to join
28
this Stipulation;
-3-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-06151 HRL
Case5:11-cv-06151-HRL Document6 Filed12/21/11 Page4 of 6
1
3. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by HTC America, Inc. or any other
2
named defendant joining the Stipulation of any defense, including but not limited
3
to the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction,
4
improper venue, sufficiency of process, or service of process.
5
4. As a condition of entry into this Stipulation, defendant HTC America, Inc. and any
6
other defendant(s) joining this Stipulation, and the plaintiffs, agree that they are
7
complying with and will continue to comply with all evidentiary preservation
8
obligations under governing law.
9
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12
DATED: December 21, 2011
STRANGE & CARPENTER
13
14
By: /s/ Brian R. Strange
Brian R. Strange
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
15
16
DATED: December 21, 2011
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
17
18
19
20
By: /s/ Rosemarie T. Ring
Rosemarie T. Ring
Attorneys for Defendant
HTC America, Inc.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-06151 HRL
Case5:11-cv-06151-HRL Document6 Filed12/21/11 Page5 of 6
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, it is SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: January 9, 2012
Honorable Howard R. Lloyd
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-06151 HRL
Case5:11-cv-06151-HRL Document6 Filed12/21/11 Page6 of 6
1
CERTIFICATION
2
I, Rosemarie T. Ring, am the ECF User whose identification and password are
3
being used to file this STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
4
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
5
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that
6
Brian R. Strange concurred in this filing.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-06151 HRL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?