Young v. Alameda County Superior Court
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO PAY FILING FEE. Petitioner must file proof that he paid the $5.00 filing fee no later than June 19, 2012. FAILURE TO FILE A TIMELY RESPONSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER. . Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/29/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
BRIAN YOUNG,
Petitioner,
12
13
vs.
14
15
16
ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 11-06235 EJD (PR)
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME TO PAY
FILING FEE
17
18
On December 13, 2011, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a
19
petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On the same day,
20
the Clerk of the court sent a notice to Petitioner that the petition was deficient
21
because he failed to pay the filing fee or file an In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”)
22
Application. (Docket No. 2.)
23
On January 5, 2012, Petitioner filed an IFP application which was deficient
24
because he failed to submit the following supporting documents: 1) a Certificate of
25
Funds in Prisoner’s account completed and signed by an authorized prison official;
26
and 2) a copy of his prisoner trust account statement showing transactions for the
27
last six months. (Docket No. 4.) In the interest of justice, Petitioner was granted an
28
extension of time to file the missing documents to complete his IFP application, such
Order Granting 2nd EOT to Pay Fee
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.11\06235Young_eot-ifp2.wpd
1
2
that a response was due no later than May 20, 2012. (See Docket No. 7.)
On May 7, 2012, Petitioner filed a letter indicating that he was attempting to
3
pay the $5.00 filing fee. In the interest of justice, the Court grants Petitioner a
4
second extension of time to pay the filing fee. Petitioner must file proof that he paid
5
the $5.00 filing fee no later than June 19, 2012.
6
FAILURE TO FILE A TIMELY RESPONSE IN ACCORDANCE
7
WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS
8
ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER.
9
DATED:
5/29/2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting 2nd EOT to Pay Fee
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.11\06235Young_eot-ifp2.wpd
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRIAN YOUNG,
Case Number: CV11-06235 EJD
Petitioner,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,
Respondent.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
5/30/2012
That on
, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the
attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)
hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into
an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Brian Young BBT 898
Santa Rita County Jail
5325 Broder Blvd.,
Dublin, CA 94568
Dated:
5/30/2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?