Burns v. Swarthout

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the petition (Docket No. 11) and all attachments thereto on Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The Clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on Petitioner. Habeas Answer due by 4/26/2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/22/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RICHARD L. BURNS, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 14 GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 11-06301 EJD (PR) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at the California State Prison-Solano 18 has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 Petitioner has paid the filing fee. 20 BACKGROUND 21 22 According to the amended petition (Docket No. 11), Petitioner pleaded guilty 23 in San Mateo County Superior Court to several counts of assault with a firearm. 24 Petitioner was sentenced to seventeen years and eight months in state prison. (Am. 25 Pet. at 1.) 26 Petitioner filed state habeas petitions, with the California Supreme Court 27 denying review in September 2011. (Id. at 5.) Petitioner filed the instant federal 28 habeas petition on November 28, 2011. Order To Show Cause 06301Burns_osc.wpd DISCUSSION 1 2 A. Standard of Review This court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a 3 4 person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that 5 he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United 6 States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). It shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show 7 8 cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that 9 the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” Id. § 2243. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 B. Legal Claims Petitioner claims the following grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) counsel 12 was ineffective in allowing Petitioner plead to the maximum sentence; and (2) the 13 trial court coerced Petitioner into providing the plea and erred by accepting it. 14 Liberally construed, these claim are cognizable under § 2254 and merit an answer 15 from Respondent. 16 CONCLUSION 17 18 For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown, 19 1. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the 20 petition (Docket No. 11) and all attachments thereto on Respondent and 21 Respondent’s attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The Clerk 22 also shall serve a copy of this order on Petitioner. 23 2. Respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner, within 24 sixty (60) days of the issuance of this order, an answer conforming in all respects to 25 Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of 26 habeas corpus should not be issued. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve 27 on Petitioner a copy of all portions of the state trial record that have been transcribed 28 previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the Order To Show Cause 06301Burns_osc.wpd 2 1 petition. 2 If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a 3 traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty (30) days of his 4 receipt of the answer. 5 3. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu 6 of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules 7 Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall 8 file with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non- 9 opposition within thirty (30) days of receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall file with the court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen (15) days of receipt 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 of any opposition. 12 4. Petitioner is reminded that all communications with the court must be 13 served on Respondent by mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent’s 14 counsel. Petitioner must also keep the Court and all parties informed of any change 15 of address. 16 DATED: 2/22/2013 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order To Show Cause 06301Burns_osc.wpd 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD L. BURNS, Case Number CV 11-06301 EJD (PR) Petitioner, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on ______________________________, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the 2/25/2013 attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Richard L. Burns AA-7046 Bldg. 1-244 California State Prison, Solano P. O. Box 4000 Vacaville, CA 65696-4000 2/25/2013 DATED: ________________________ Richard W. Wieking, Clerk /s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?