Landstar Carrier Services, Inc v. Bouapha

Filing 39

ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal granting 36 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LANDSTAR CARRIER SERVICES, INC, Plaintiff, 8 9 v. 10 ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT JOHN BOUAPHA, (Re: Docket No. 36) Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 5:11-cv-06332-PSG 12 13 Plaintiff Landstar Carrier Services, Inc. sued Defendant John Bouapha several years ago to 14 recover money Bouapha owed it.1 After Bouapha failed to appear, the Clerk of Court entered 15 default against him, and then default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1) in the amount of 16 $204,212.84 plus costs and interest.2 Landstar now moves for a writ of garnishment of Bouapha’s 17 wages.3 Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(1), “[a] money judgment is enforced by a writ of execution, 18 19 unless the court directs otherwise. The procedure on execution—and in proceedings 20 supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution—must accord with the procedure of the 21 state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies.” Cal. Code 22 Civ. Proc. §§ 706.010 et seq. provide the exclusive judicial procedure for garnishing the wages of 23 24 1 See Docket No. 1. 2 See Docket Nos. 6, 14. 3 See Docket No. 36. 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:11-cv-06332-PSG ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT 1 a judgment debtor.4 Wage garnishment is accomplished by an earnings withholding order, which 2 orders the debtor’s employer to withhold a portion of the debtor’s disposable earnings to satisfy a 3 non-support judgment.5 In order to effectuate a wage garnishment, the creditor must obtain the earnings 4 5 withholding order by filing an application, supporting documentation and the required fee with the 6 levying officer in the county where the order is to be served.6 The levying officer must then serve 7 the withholding order on the debtor’s employer, at which point the employer must withhold the 8 nonexempt portion of the employee’s disposable earnings for any pay period that ends during the 9 withholding period, and pay the levying officer, by the 15th of each month, all funds withheld during the preceding month.7 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 706.050 governs the maximum amount of a 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 judgment debtor’s disposable earnings that can be subject to levy under an earnings withholding 12 order. 13 Landstar has complied with the requirements for obtaining an earnings withholding order 14 under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 706.010 et seq.8 The earnings withholding order, Form WG-002, 15 explains how to calculate the maximum amount of withholding from disposable earnings.9 16 Landstar’s motion for writ of garnishment to execute the default judgment properly entered by the 17 Clerk of Court is GRANTED. 18 19 20 21 See Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 706.020. 5 See Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 706.020-25. 6 See Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 706.102(a). 7 See Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 706.022(b), 706.025(a), 706.101. 8 22 4 See Docket Nos. 36, 36-1, 36-2, 36-3, 36-4, 36-5, 36-6. 9 See Docket No. 36-1 at 2. 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 5:11-cv-06332-PSG ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT 1 SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: April 21, 2016 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 5:11-cv-06332-PSG ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?