Barnyard, LLC v. Post-Confirmation Creditors' Committee

Filing 4

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute. Show Cause Response due by 7/23/2012. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 7/9/12. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 BARNYARD, LLC, Appellant, v. POST-CONFIRMATION CREDITORS’ COMMITTEE, Appellee. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 11-CV-06353-LHK ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 16 Appellant filed his notice of appeal from Bankruptcy Court on December 15, 2011. ECF 17 No. 1. Appellant was required to serve and file a brief 28 days after the record of appeal was 18 entered on the District Court docket. See Bankruptcy Local Rule 8010-1; Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8010. 19 Indeed, Appellant has not filed anything since December 2011, and appears to have abandoned his 20 appeal. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Appellant to show cause why this case should not be 21 dismissed for failure to prosecute. Appellant must file a response explaining why this case should 22 not be dismissed for failure to prosecute by July 23, 2012. Failure to file a timely response will 23 result in the appeal being dismissed. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: July 9, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 28 1 Case No.: 11-CV-06353-LHK ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?