Hoang et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Filing
8
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A "CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE," OR ELSE A "DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT." Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on February 9, 2012. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
SUSAN B. HOANG, ET AL.,
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, ET
)
AL.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
Case No.: C 11-06364 PSG
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES
TO FILE EITHER A “CONSENT TO
PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE,” OR ELSE A
“DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT”
17
18
Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (“JP Morgan”) moves to dismiss. This case has been
19
assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge. Before the court takes any further action in the case,
20
the court must determine whether or not all of the parties who have appeared consent to magistrate
21
judge jurisdiction by the undersigned, or whether any of the parties request reassignment to a district
22
judge. Therefore,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than February 16, 2012, each party shall file either
24
a “Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or else a “Declination to Proceed
25
Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment.” Both forms are available
26
from the Clerk of the Court, or from the Forms (Civil) section of the court’s website at
27
28
Case No.: 11-6364 PSG
ORDER
1
1
www.cand.uscourts.gov.
2
Dated: 2/9/2012
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 11-6364 PSG
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?